Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
214<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF WORK ORGANISATIONS<br />
This chapter will discuss work organisation activities and changes occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>m. <strong>Work<strong>in</strong>g</strong> people were asked, among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, about teamwork and<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> workplace organisation. They were also asked about different development<br />
projects at <strong>the</strong> workplace. The motivation for this topic arises because<br />
so many studies emphasise that <strong>the</strong> ways of work<strong>in</strong>g and choices made<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> workplaces are very important for <strong>the</strong>ir competitiveness. (Cf. Antila<br />
& Ylöstalo <strong>2002</strong>, Womack et al. 1990, Appelbaum et al. 2000, Arnal et al.<br />
2001, Flexibility Matters 1999).<br />
Companies, or more generally workplaces, are not ’black boxes’ whose operational<br />
ef<strong>fi</strong>ciency or quality are def<strong>in</strong>ed mechanically accord<strong>in</strong>g to quantitative<br />
or qualitative <strong>in</strong>vestments that <strong>the</strong>y make <strong>in</strong> various production factors<br />
(e.g. purchase of new mach<strong>in</strong>es or equipment, or personnel tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g). The<br />
process by which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestments are transformed <strong>in</strong>to a yield such as products<br />
or services, can be implemented <strong>in</strong> many alternative ways. Factors like process<br />
control mechanisms, forms of work<strong>in</strong>g, management methods, or <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />
relationships with<strong>in</strong> and between companies, have key signi<strong>fi</strong>cance <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
how <strong>the</strong> companies are able to make use of <strong>the</strong> production factors at<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir disposal (Alaso<strong>in</strong>i 2000).<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g graph exam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence of several aspects connected with<br />
<strong>the</strong> everyday activities of work organisations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> countries and <strong>in</strong><br />
F<strong>in</strong>land. The graph shows that group work or teamwork has ga<strong>in</strong>ed very great<br />
popularity. Of <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish work<strong>in</strong>g people, as many as three-quarters said that<br />
at <strong>the</strong>ir workplace, work was done <strong>in</strong> teams. This proportion is larger than <strong>in</strong><br />
any of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> countries. Also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se, however, teamwork is usual nowadays.<br />
In Latvia, two out of three work<strong>in</strong>g people stated that work was done <strong>in</strong><br />
teams at <strong>the</strong>ir workplace. Slightly more than half <strong>in</strong> Lithuania, and half <strong>in</strong> Estonia,<br />
answered that way.<br />
In Lithuania, teamwork takes place considerably more often <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public than<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sector. In Latvia and Estonia, <strong>the</strong> situation is <strong>the</strong> opposite - that<br />
is, teamwork is more common <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sector; <strong>in</strong> actual fact, <strong>the</strong> differ-