05.06.2013 Views

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

153<br />

TOO HIGH WORK INTENSITY BY ENTERPRISE TYPE<br />

LATVIA<br />

old, not reorganised<br />

old, but reorganised<br />

new, established<br />

after re-<strong>in</strong>dependence<br />

ESTONIA<br />

old, not reorganised<br />

old, but reorganised<br />

new, established<br />

after re-<strong>in</strong>dependence<br />

32%<br />

29%<br />

31%<br />

35%<br />

39%<br />

39%<br />

40%<br />

45%<br />

43%<br />

43%<br />

48%<br />

47%<br />

1998<br />

<strong>2002</strong><br />

LITHUANIA<br />

old, not reorganised<br />

30%<br />

41%<br />

old, but reorganised<br />

new, established<br />

after re-<strong>in</strong>dependence<br />

33%<br />

43%<br />

44%<br />

49%<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%<br />

More detailed analyses reveal that <strong>the</strong> hardest, most <strong>in</strong>tensive work<strong>in</strong>g life of<br />

all <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> countries is experienced by those women <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian<br />

public sector who work <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r job besides <strong>the</strong>ir pr<strong>in</strong>cipal one. More than<br />

half of <strong>the</strong>se (52 %) said that <strong>the</strong> work <strong>in</strong>tensity was too great. It can be concluded<br />

that <strong>the</strong> issue here is that of human ability to cope. Do<strong>in</strong>g two jobs,<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> general <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g tempo, puts demands on a<br />

worker's strength. At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r extreme are <strong>the</strong> men work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Estonian<br />

public sector who do not do ano<strong>the</strong>r job <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong>ir ma<strong>in</strong> one. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, only just over one-<strong>fi</strong>fth (22 %) felt <strong>the</strong> work <strong>in</strong>tensity was too high and<br />

about one <strong>in</strong> three (34 %) considered it too low.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g mean value table, work <strong>in</strong>tensity is exam<strong>in</strong>ed simultaneously<br />

both accord<strong>in</strong>g to gender and to sector (public-private). The scale of variation<br />

is 1-5, where value 1 signi<strong>fi</strong>es an op<strong>in</strong>ion that <strong>the</strong> work <strong>in</strong>tensity is absolutely<br />

too great. Value 5 is <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r extreme, at which completely <strong>the</strong> opposite view<br />

is held. Value 3, <strong>the</strong>refore, is <strong>the</strong> neutral midpo<strong>in</strong>t at which <strong>the</strong> work <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />

is seen as be<strong>in</strong>g at a suitable level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!