Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
217<br />
dicators. Also <strong>the</strong> low level of <strong>in</strong>itiative among personnel <strong>in</strong> this sector 2 tells<br />
of special problems <strong>in</strong> it. The fact that <strong>the</strong>re are few development suggestions<br />
does not always mean that <strong>the</strong>re is no need for improvement.<br />
Lithuania also differs from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two <strong>Baltic</strong> countries as regards <strong>the</strong> activity<br />
of different-aged personnel <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned development <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />
The older <strong>the</strong> age-group studied, <strong>the</strong> fewer suggestions for improvement<br />
have been made <strong>in</strong> Lithuania. The activity <strong>in</strong> this regard has not been at a peak<br />
level even among <strong>the</strong> youngest, but it decreases still fur<strong>the</strong>r with age. In Estonia<br />
and Latvia, no correspond<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between age and development<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative activity is discernible.<br />
The mak<strong>in</strong>g of improvement suggestions, <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> countries, is strongly<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong> educational background of those concerned. The higher <strong>the</strong> level<br />
of education, <strong>the</strong> more actively suggestions are made aimed at improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
work<strong>in</strong>g conditions or <strong>the</strong> quality of a product/service; and vice versa. In all<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> nations, a m<strong>in</strong>ority (43 % <strong>in</strong> Latvia, 40 % <strong>in</strong> Estonia and 23 % <strong>in</strong><br />
Lithuania) of those work<strong>in</strong>g people who had only a basic education had shown<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative; whereas a clear majority (67 % <strong>in</strong> Estonia, 66 % <strong>in</strong> Latvia and 63 %<br />
<strong>in</strong> Lithuania) of those with higher education had made one or more suggestions<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> survey. Only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of higher education<br />
did Lithuania not differ signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Baltic</strong> countries. At<br />
lower educational levels, by contrast, it is conspicuous how work<strong>in</strong>g people <strong>in</strong><br />
Lithuania clearly made fewer improvement-aimed suggestions than those <strong>in</strong><br />
Latvia and Estonia. It can be concluded that <strong>the</strong> ”bottom-up” type of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and <strong>in</strong>formation flow does not work properly <strong>in</strong> Lithuania.<br />
There has clearly been more of a tendency <strong>in</strong> Lithuania than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
countries to take a ”top-down” approach to development activities, and evidently<br />
it is done fairly often without consult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> workers. Noticeably often,<br />
a consultant has been hired for <strong>the</strong> workplace or some o<strong>the</strong>r similar project has<br />
2 Of those work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian private sector, 11 % had made one and 25 % more than one suggestion<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> past year. Of those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector, 17 % had made one and 33 % more than<br />
one suggestion dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same time span. In <strong>the</strong> Latvian private sector, 19 % had made one and 36 %<br />
more than one suggestion; <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>fi</strong>gures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector were 17 % and 40 %. Of<br />
Estonia's private-sector workers, 15 % had made one suggestion and 39 % more than one dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
previous year. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g proportions for Estonia's public sector were 17 % and 36 %.