05.06.2013 Views

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74<br />

In any case, <strong>the</strong> proportion of un<strong>in</strong>formed persons was considerably greater <strong>in</strong><br />

Estonia than <strong>in</strong> Latvia and Lithuania. From this, it can be concluded that <strong>the</strong><br />

trade union movement <strong>in</strong> Estonia has been able to make a clean break with <strong>the</strong><br />

old way of work<strong>in</strong>g that was normal dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Soviet period. Present trade<br />

union activity <strong>in</strong> Estonia is not perceived as be<strong>in</strong>g a cont<strong>in</strong>uation of old times.<br />

Respondents were unable, however, to say what <strong>the</strong> trade unions actually do<br />

nowadays and how <strong>the</strong>y work.<br />

The general uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty among wage earners as to how <strong>the</strong> trade union movement<br />

operates can also be seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that most of <strong>the</strong>m do not know<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> trade unions have possibilities of controll<strong>in</strong>g or monitor<strong>in</strong>g adherence<br />

with agreements made. In Latvia, one <strong>in</strong> <strong>fi</strong>ve employees believed that <strong>the</strong><br />

trade unions had at least quite good possibilities of controll<strong>in</strong>g compliance<br />

with agreements; 15 % of <strong>the</strong> workers <strong>in</strong> Lithuania and 14 % <strong>in</strong> Estonia were<br />

of that op<strong>in</strong>ion. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, a m<strong>in</strong>ority of <strong>the</strong> wage earners thought that<br />

<strong>the</strong> possibilities <strong>in</strong> question were poor. In all three countries, nearly half <strong>the</strong><br />

employees could not answer <strong>the</strong> question at all; and, fur<strong>the</strong>r, almost one-quarter<br />

were unable to formulate <strong>the</strong>ir view one way or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r and chose <strong>the</strong><br />

neutral alternative. This be<strong>in</strong>g so, <strong>the</strong> proportion who were un<strong>in</strong>formed varied<br />

between <strong>the</strong> high <strong>fi</strong>gures of 67-70 %, depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> country: <strong>in</strong> a nutshell,<br />

two-thirds of <strong>the</strong> wage earners could not say whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> trade union<br />

movement was able to control adherence to agreements made.<br />

How well or badly are trade unions able to control workplaces' adherence<br />

to agreements, <strong>in</strong> general? Percentage of all respondents.<br />

LATVIA LITHUANIA ESTONIA<br />

Very well 4 % 1 % 2 %<br />

Quite well 16 % 14 % 12 %<br />

Not well nor badly 22 % 24 % 23 %<br />

Quite badly 6 % 11 % 11 %<br />

Very badly 4 % 7 % 5 %<br />

Do not know 48 % 43 % 47 %<br />

Total 100 %<br />

(N=904)<br />

100 %<br />

(N=909)<br />

100 %<br />

(N=900)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!