05.06.2013 Views

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

PROPORTION OF EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE SIGNED SOME EXTRA AGREEMENT<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

10%<br />

6%<br />

6%<br />

1998 <strong>2002</strong><br />

9% 9%<br />

ESTONIA LATVIA LITHUANIA<br />

Question 3: Besides <strong>the</strong> employment contract, have you, through <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiative of <strong>the</strong> employer, signed any o<strong>the</strong>r extra<br />

agreement (such as a shorter paid leave, large volume of work to be covered, an agreement on your enrolment and<br />

dismissal with no speci<strong>fi</strong>cation of <strong>the</strong> date etc.)?<br />

The mak<strong>in</strong>g of extra agreements has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> Latvia and Lithuania and<br />

decreased <strong>in</strong> Estonia. In Latvia and Lithuania, about one <strong>in</strong> ten wage earners<br />

said that <strong>the</strong>y had signed some extra agreement. An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g phenomenon<br />

was that one-tenth of <strong>the</strong> employees <strong>in</strong> Latvia and Estonia and as many as 15<br />

% of <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian wage earners decl<strong>in</strong>ed to answer this question. It can<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore be assumed that <strong>the</strong> matter is too sensitive to be dealt with <strong>in</strong> a survey.<br />

We are presumably mov<strong>in</strong>g here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same sensitive area as when ask<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about unreported <strong>in</strong>come, for <strong>in</strong>stance. Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to answer probably signi<strong>fi</strong>es<br />

some degree of activity which <strong>the</strong> respondent does not wish to discuss. If<br />

those who have decl<strong>in</strong>ed to answer can be assumed to have made an extra<br />

agreement of some k<strong>in</strong>d, e.g. about unreported wages to be paid, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />

who have made some sort of extra agreement will be signi<strong>fi</strong>cantly<br />

greater than <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> diagram above. Lend<strong>in</strong>g support to this <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

is <strong>the</strong> fact that a greater part of those <strong>in</strong> Estonia and Latvia who had<br />

made an extra agreement and answered <strong>the</strong> question were satis<strong>fi</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong><br />

content of <strong>the</strong> agreement. Only <strong>in</strong> Lithuania was <strong>the</strong>re more dissatisfaction<br />

with <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> extra agreement than <strong>the</strong>re was satisfaction. There, well<br />

on <strong>the</strong> way to half of those who had made an extra agreement were unable to<br />

estimate <strong>the</strong>ir satisfaction with <strong>the</strong> agreement content. The answers of men and<br />

women were quite similar <strong>in</strong> each country.<br />

4%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!