27.06.2013 Views

Gibson Ferguson Language Planning and Education Edinburgh ...

Gibson Ferguson Language Planning and Education Edinburgh ...

Gibson Ferguson Language Planning and Education Edinburgh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

The global spread of English: cause,<br />

agency, effects <strong>and</strong> policy responses<br />

The global spread of English has been thoroughly documented in a range of wellknown<br />

publications: for example, those by Cheshire (1991), Crystal (1995, 1997),<br />

McArthur (1998), Graddol (1997) <strong>and</strong> Ammon (2001a). By now, therefore, the<br />

dominance of English as a global lingua franca, or ‘hypercentral language’ (de Swaan<br />

2001a), is hardly disputed empirically, even by those most critical of this state<br />

of affairs such as Phillipson (1992, 2000a, 2003), Phillipson <strong>and</strong> Skuttnab-Kangas<br />

(1995, 1996, 1999), Pennycook (1994, 1995, 2001) <strong>and</strong> Tollefson (1991, 2002a).<br />

It would be uneconomical, therefore, to reiterate other than in the briefest manner<br />

the statistical <strong>and</strong> factual basis for the claims made to global dominance. Instead, our<br />

main focus is on the causes, effects <strong>and</strong> implications of the global spread of English<br />

<strong>and</strong> how these have been variously interpreted, bearing in mind Spolsky’s observation<br />

(2004: 91) that ‘English as a global language is now a factor that needs to be<br />

taken into account in its language policy by any nation state’.<br />

In the present chapter, then, we focus on the socio-political <strong>and</strong> ideological<br />

dimensions of English spread, paying attention to implications for English language<br />

teaching. It need hardly be said that the implications of the global dominance of<br />

English for social justice, equality within <strong>and</strong> between nations, linguistic <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

diversity <strong>and</strong> economic development are complex <strong>and</strong> contested. It may be helpful,<br />

therefore, to consider the debate over cause <strong>and</strong> agency in the spread of English<br />

before moving on to an examination of the various effects of the dominance of<br />

English.<br />

5.1 CAUSE AND AGENCY IN THE GLOBAL SPREAD OF<br />

ENGLISH<br />

It is widely accepted, with good reason, that the spread <strong>and</strong> decline of languages is<br />

causally linked to the power <strong>and</strong> the fortunes of their speakers rather than to any<br />

properties of the language code. St<strong>and</strong>ard explanations of the spread of English have,<br />

therefore, emphasised firstly the role of the British empire <strong>and</strong> secondly the growing<br />

economic, military <strong>and</strong> political dominance of the United States in the later<br />

twentieth century as key factors (Crystal 1997; Graddol 1997).<br />

The British colonial empire is seen as creating the necessary initial conditions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!