Gibson Ferguson Language Planning and Education Edinburgh ...

222 Language Planning and Education
DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 229–41.
Quirk, R. (1990a), ‘Language varieties and standard language’, English Today 21, 3–10.
(Reprinted in Seidlhofer, B. (ed.), Controversies in Applied Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 9–19.)
Quirk, R. (1990b), ‘What is standard English?’, in Quirk, R. and G. Stein, English in Use,
London: Longman, pp. 112–25.
Ramirez, J. (1992), ‘Executive summary’, Bilingual Research Journal 16, 1 and 2, 1–62.
Ramirez, J., S. Yuen and D. Ramey (1991), Executive Summary: Final Report: Longitudinal
Study of Structured English Immersion, Early-Exit and Late-Exit Transitional Bilingual
Education Programs for Language-Minority Children (report submitted to the US
Department of Education), San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International.
Raz, J. (1994), Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Ricento, T. (1996), ‘Language policy in the United States’ in Herriman, M. and B. Burnaby
(eds), Language Policy in English-Dominant Countries: Six Case Studies, Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters, pp. 122–58.
Ricento, T. (1998), ‘National language policy in the United States’, in Ricento, T. and
B. Burnaby (eds), Language and Politics in the United States and Canada, Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 85–112.
Ricento, T. (ed.) (2000a), Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English, Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Ricento, T. (2000b), ‘Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning’,
in Ricento, T. (ed.) (2000a), Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English,
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–24.
Ridge, S. (2000), ‘Mixed motives: ideological elements in the support for English in South
Africa’, in Ricento, T. (ed.), Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English,
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 151–72.
Ritzer, G. (1996), The McDonaldization of Society, London: Sage.
Romaine, S. (2002), ‘The impact of language policy on endangered languages’, International
Journal on Multicultural Societies 4, 2, 1–28.
Rossell, C. and K. Baker (1996), ‘The educational effectiveness of bilingual education’,
Research in the Teaching of English 30, 1, 7–74.
Roy-Campbell, Z. (2003), ‘Promoting African languages as conveyors of knowledge in
educational institutions’, in Makoni, S., G. Smitherman, A. Ball and A. Spears (eds), Black
Linguistics: Language, Society, and Politics in Africa and the Americas, London: Routledge,
pp. 83–102.
Rubagumya, C. (ed.) (1990), Language in Education in Africa: a Tanzanian Perspective,
Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Rubin, J. (1971), ‘Evaluation and language planning’, in Rubin, J. and B. Jernudd (eds), Can
Language Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations, Honolulu,
East-West Center: Hawaii University Press, pp. 271–52.
Rubin, J. and B. Jernudd (eds) (1971), Can Language Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and
Practice for Developing Nations. Honolulu, East-West Center: Hawaii University Press.
Ruiz, R. (1984), ‘Orientations in language planning’, NABE Journal 8, 2, 15–34.
Rumberger, R. (2000), Educational Outcomes and Opportunities for English Language Learners,
University of California Linguistic Minorities Research Institute.
Russell, J. (1990), ‘Success as a source of conflict in language planning: the Tanzanian case’,
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11, 5, 363–75.
Safran, W. (1999), ‘Politics and language in contemporary France: facing supranational and
intranational challenges’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 137, 39–66.
Schiffman, H. (1996), Linguistic Culture and Language Policy, London: Routledge.
Schmid, C. (2001), The Politics of Language: Conflict, Identity and Cultural Pluralism in