24.07.2013 Views

Inventing our future Collective action for a sustainable economy

Inventing our future Collective action for a sustainable economy

Inventing our future Collective action for a sustainable economy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24<br />

5.28 Partnering: the principle of partnering is to increase cooperation between those organisations<br />

involved in producing the various elements of the process that results in housing products. This<br />

approach has been promoted <strong>for</strong> many years in the construction industry as a means of reducing<br />

costs through greater efficiency in operations, less waste, and reduced frictional costs at the points<br />

in the process where organisations interact. It should also enhance the quality of products and<br />

facilitate their harmonisation with needs and demands. These principles are set out in the ‘Egan<br />

Report.’<br />

5.29 Partnering between builders and developers has been increasing in recent years, and the RHS<br />

proposes that the use of partnering should be extended throughout the development<br />

process wherever appropriate. In particular, greater partnership is urged between landowners,<br />

developers, local authorities and housing providers, to maximise the quality and cost-efficiency of<br />

new housing schemes, particularly the larger ones expected in the Region over the coming years.<br />

Local communities should be involved as far as appropriate.<br />

5.30 The partnering approach is particularly helpful when developing s106 Agreements where<br />

discussions involving all parties at an early stage will establish a shared understanding of what is<br />

to be delivered and how it will be funded.<br />

5.31 Partnering provides a framework <strong>for</strong> the kind of supply-chain management which has been<br />

common in manufacturing and retail industries <strong>for</strong> many years.<br />

5.32 Supply-Chain Management: during the last year the Housing Corporation has developed a<br />

‘supply chain management’ process aimed at identifying af<strong>for</strong>dable housing schemes which could<br />

be delivered in the Region with or without grant res<strong>our</strong>ces. This has been an important<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation gathering tool and is showing that the majority of new schemes are opportunity led<br />

rather than reflecting a strategic process of geographical targeting. It is accepted that in the shortterm<br />

the Region will deliver what is currently in this supply chain of schemes but over time the<br />

RHS wishes to direct res<strong>our</strong>ces to promote development in the growth areas reflecting the East of<br />

England Plan and the Government’s Sustainable Communities agenda.<br />

5.33 There is always a strong likelihood of new sites <strong>for</strong> residential development to be generated by<br />

un<strong>for</strong>eseen circumstances, which means that they enter the supply-chain of potential sites at short<br />

notice, effectively in an unplanned, unmanaged process. The most common occurrence is <strong>for</strong><br />

brownfield sites to become available when industrial or other existing uses cease. Usually referred<br />

to as ‘windfall sites‘, these can offer considerable potential <strong>for</strong> the creation of additional af<strong>for</strong>dable<br />

housing, and they must be assessed <strong>for</strong> public investment within the normal framework applying<br />

to the rest of the supply chain. Although this might imply considerable time pressure, all the<br />

strategic policies recommended here <strong>for</strong> the use of s106 negotiations and other interventions in<br />

the development process should apply equally to windfall sites as to others in the supply chain.<br />

5.34 The Pipeline Project: the Pipeline Project was commissioned by the Regional Housing Board to<br />

report on what is required in the East of England to overcome barriers to the development of<br />

sufficient af<strong>for</strong>dable housing. The RHS has adopted the report’s recommendations that<br />

improvements ought to come from:<br />

• a properly co-ordinated local approach – possibly at sub-regional level – that includes a clear<br />

vision of what is required, robust assessment of needs, an estimate of the funding likely to<br />

be available from all s<strong>our</strong>ces and a realistic approach to bridging the gap between what is<br />

required and what can be provided. Priority setting is vital.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!