23.11.2014 Views

xxiii πανελληνιο συνεδριο φυσικης στερεας καταστασης & επιστημης ...

xxiii πανελληνιο συνεδριο φυσικης στερεας καταστασης & επιστημης ...

xxiii πανελληνιο συνεδριο φυσικης στερεας καταστασης & επιστημης ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Local Coordination of Zn and Fe in Glasses Containing Electric Arc Furnace Dust:<br />

a NEXAFS Study<br />

F. Pinakidou, M. Katsikini, A. Mavromati, G. Kaimakamis, Th. Kehagias and E.C. Paloura *<br />

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Physics, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.<br />

*<br />

paloura@auth.gr<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Electric arc furnace dust (EAFD), which is one of the largest solid waste streams produced by steel mills, contains<br />

mainly heavy metals and thus is considered as a toxic waste. Recycling of the valuable metals (Fe, Zn and Pb), which<br />

reduces the disposal problems and results in resource conservation, can recover only a portion of the heavy metals from the<br />

EAFD. Vitrification, leading to the formation of vitreous or glass-ceramic materials, is a promising process to stabilize<br />

metallic Zn and Fe and hence permits the safe disposal of the EAFD [1]. Therefore it is of great importance to study the<br />

bonding geometry of both Fe and Zn in vitrified EAFD-rich industrial wastes, since the structural integrity of the glass matrix<br />

depends strongly on the type of polyhedra that Fe and Zn form.<br />

2. Experimental Details<br />

The studied samples are vitrified products of EAFD (which mainly consists of ZnO<br />

and ferric oxides (ZnFe 2 O 4 )) and are produced by co-melting of the EAFD with SiO 2 ,<br />

Na 2 O and CaO at 1400°C for 2h, followed by quenching. The EAFD concentration<br />

ranges from 10 to 55 wt%, while the SiO 2 concentration is equal to 55 wt% in all<br />

studied samples. The Fe-K and Zn-K-EXAFS measurements were conducted at the<br />

synchrotron radiation facility BESSY in Berlin using the KMC2 beamline. The spectra<br />

were recorded in the fluorescence yield mode using a Si-PIN photodiode. The spectra<br />

from two reference samples, powder hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) and magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), were<br />

recorded in the transmission mode using ionization chambers.<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

The Fe-K NEXAFS spectra of the studied samples are shown in Fig. 1(a). The<br />

characteristic pre-edge peak is present in the spectra of all samples indicating that the<br />

polyhedron around Fe is either a tetrahedron or an asymmetric octahedron. The preedge<br />

absorption is attributed to 1s→3d transitions with an electric dipole or quadruple<br />

character [2]. The quadruple character of the transition is pronounced in a<br />

centrosymmetric environment while the dipole in non-centrosymmetric. However,<br />

since quadrupole transitions are 20-100 times weaker than the dipole [2], the existence<br />

of higher distortion leads to higher intensity of the pre-edge peak. Hence, the presence<br />

of the pre-edge peak is a fingerprint of units lacking inversion center while its intensity<br />

relates to the bonding environment of Fe. The Fe-K-NEXAFS spectra were fitted using<br />

a sigmoidal (Boltzmann function) to simulate the absorption edge (E abs ) and Lorentz or<br />

Voigt functions to simulate the pre-edge peak. In order to isolate the pre-edge region,<br />

and thus reveal the characteristics of the pre-edge peak more clearly, the sigmoidal<br />

function was subtracted from the Fe-K-NEXAFS spectra. The resulting pre-edge peaks<br />

are shown in Fig. 2(a) while the results of the Fe-K-NEXAFS analysis are listed in<br />

Table 1.<br />

As mentioned above, the differences in the shape of the pre-edge peak indicate<br />

changes in the bonding environment of Fe. The Fe-K-NEXAFS analysis reveals that<br />

the differences in the pre-peak among the studied glasses and reference compounds are<br />

quite significant and thus a different number of functions, centered at different energies,<br />

is necessary to fit the pre-edge region. More specifically, as shown in Table 1, the preedge<br />

peak of Fe 2 O 3 was fitted using functions positioned at 7113.1 and 7114.2 eV and<br />

7116.5 eV. The first two correspond to Fe +3 in octahedral sites while the third one is<br />

attributed to clustering of Fe [2] and its contribution will be ignored. In the spectra of<br />

Fe 3 O 4 , the following three functions were used for the simulation of the pre-edge peak:<br />

the one at 7111.1 eV corresponds to octahedrally coordinated Fe +2 , the second one at<br />

7112.7 eV corr3esponds to tetrahedrally coordinated Fe +3 while the third one at 7114.6<br />

eV is assigned to octahedrally coordinated Fe +3 . Furthermore, the total area under the<br />

pre-edge peak is significantly different between the two reference samples. The larger<br />

area in magnetite (0.63±0.03 a.u.) compared to hematite (0.43±0.02 a.u.) designates the<br />

different environment of Fe: Fe ions in tetrahedral sites (non-symmetric) in Fe 3 O 4 leads<br />

to an increase of the area while in Fe 2 O 3 , Fe occupies octahedral sites, leading to a<br />

broader and of lower intensity (smaller area) pre-edge peak.<br />

The differences in the shape of the pre-edge peak, which indicate coordination<br />

changes of the Fe ion, are also detected in the spectra of the studied glasses. The<br />

number of functions needed to fit the pre-edge peak is determined by the symmetry of<br />

Intensity (arb. units)<br />

Intensity (arb. units)<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Fe-K edge<br />

Fe 3<br />

O 4<br />

Fe 2<br />

O 3<br />

10 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

15 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

20 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

25 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

30 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

(a)<br />

0<br />

7080 7100 7120 7140 7160<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

10 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

15 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

20 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

25 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

E (eV)<br />

Zn-K edge<br />

30 wt%<br />

EAFD<br />

(b)<br />

0<br />

9620 9640 9660 9680 9700<br />

E (eV)<br />

Figure 1: (a) The Fe-K NEXAFS<br />

spectra of the studied glasses and<br />

reference Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 and (b)<br />

The respective Zn-K NEXAFS<br />

spectra of all studied samples.<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!