PhD Final Thesis April 2013.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Repeatability and Validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek ...$

<strong>Thesis</strong> Keith Gale 2013Table 7.12: Stage One independent samples t-tests for 164 discrete and framework projectsStage One - Independent Samples TestLevene's Test for Variancest-test for Equality of MeansF Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)MeanDifference95% Confidence Interval ofStd. Error the DifferenceDifference Lower UpperCSF1A resultVariances assumed .133 .716 -1.088 162 .278 -.002513 .002310 -.007073 .002048Variances not assumed -1.073 118.146 .285 -.002513 .002341 -.007149 .002124CSF1B resultVariances assumed .565 .453 -2.134 162 .034 -.014984 .007021 -.028849 -.001120Variances not assumed -2.056 109.839 .042 -.014984 .007287 -.029426 -.000542CSF2 resultVariances assumed 2.110 .148 -19.857 162 .000 -.143664 .007235 -.157951 -.129377Variances not assumed -18.117 93.095 .000 -.143664 .007930 -.159411 -.127917CSF3 resultVariances assumed 82.613 .000 -4.679 162 .000 -.057436 .012276 -.081677 -.033195Variances not assumed -4.124 84.325 .000 -.057436 .013929 -.085133 -.029738CSF4 resultVariances assumed 15.224 .000 -4.089 162 .000 -.028286 .006917 -.041946 -.014627Variances not assumed -4.013 116.254 .000 -.028286 .007049 -.042248 -.014324Project successindexVariances assumed 32.698 .000 -13.107 162 .000 -.2468829 .0188359 -.2840784 -.2096874Variances not assumed -11.602 85.356 .000 -.2468829 .0212792 -.2891892 -.2045766152
<strong>Thesis</strong> Keith Gale 20137.15 Interpretation of Stage One independent samples t-testsA test for equality (Levene, 1960) is used to determine whether the same variance ofscores occur for both groups. The outcome of this test decides which value to use forcalculating the effect size. If the Sig. value exceeds 0.05 then ‘equal variancesassumed’ is used. If the Sig. value is 0.05 or less, then ‘equal variances not assumed’value is used. The relevant t-test value is used to calculate effect size to provide anindication of the magnitude of difference between the groups. For all independent t-tests, an Eta squared formula is used to determine effect size with values between 0and 1 to represent the proportion of variance in the dependant variable comparedwith the independent group variable. The Eta squared formula is:Eta squared = t²t² + (N1 + N2 – 2)7.15.1 Interpretation for CSF1A – Starting on time:Cohen (1998) proposes guidelines for interpretation of the Eta squared values. Theseare: 0.01=Small differences, 0.06=Moderate difference, 0.14=Large difference.Eta squared for CSF1A = -1.088²-1.088² + (60 + 104 – 2)Eta squared for CSF1A = 0.007An independent t-test was used to compare the ‘starting on time’ critical successfactor scores for discrete verses framework projects. There was no significantdifference in scores for discrete projects (M=0.158, SD=0.014) and frameworkprojects (M=0.160, SD=0.014), t (162) =-1.088, p=0.278). The magnitude of thedifferences in the means was very small (0.007).153
Page 1 and 2:
AN EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCEIMPROVE
Page 3 and 4:
Finally, but of course not last, is
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTSChapter 1INTRODUCTION AND C
Page 7 and 8:
3.21 From linear performance toward
Page 9 and 10:
7.9 Critical success factors and pr
Page 11 and 12:
9.13 Use of factor analysis for soc
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OFFIGURESFigure 1.1 Timeline o
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 9.8Figure 9.9Figure 9.10Boxp
Page 17 and 18:
Table 7.10 Project characteristics
Page 19 and 20:
LIST OFAPPENDICESAppendix 1The link
Page 21 and 22:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 1: IN
Page 23 and 24:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013All suppliers
Page 25 and 26:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013non-European
Page 27 and 28:
Thesis Keith Gale 20131.2.7 Geared
Page 29 and 30:
Thesis Keith Gale 20131.4 Aim and O
Page 31 and 32:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Current profe
Page 33 and 34:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013In order to r
Page 35 and 36:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013accepting the
Page 37 and 38:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Timeline of S
Page 39 and 40:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013approach towa
Page 41 and 42:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013spending prof
Page 43 and 44:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013School, 2008)
Page 45 and 46:
Thesis Keith Gale 20131.11 From ben
Page 47 and 48:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013select lists.
Page 49 and 50:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013positioning i
Page 51 and 52:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 2: IM
Page 53 and 54:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013competition i
Page 55 and 56:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013systems (for
Page 57 and 58:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013and services
Page 59 and 60:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013recognition o
Page 61 and 62:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013individual pr
Page 63 and 64:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013continuity of
Page 65 and 66:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 2.1: Al
Page 67 and 68:
Thesis Keith Gale 20132.8 SummaryAt
Page 69 and 70:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 3: LI
Page 71 and 72:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013The procureme
Page 73 and 74:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013• A ‘cogn
Page 75 and 76:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013beliefs and c
Page 77 and 78:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 3.1: Te
Page 79 and 80:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013and affect sa
Page 81 and 82:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Aside from so
Page 83 and 84:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013coupled with
Page 85 and 86:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013precious ston
Page 87 and 88:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013methods incre
Page 89 and 90:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013procurement,
Page 91 and 92:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013tender list c
Page 93 and 94:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013success facto
Page 95 and 96:
Thesis Keith Gale 20131998). The mo
Page 97 and 98:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Relationships
Page 99 and 100:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 4: HY
Page 101 and 102:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Recognitions
Page 103 and 104:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013H2: Framework
Page 105 and 106:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Group C: Iden
Page 107 and 108:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013collection of
Page 109 and 110:
Thesis Keith Gale 20134.7.4 Interac
Page 111 and 112:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Within constr
Page 113 and 114:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013• Static me
Page 115 and 116:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013performance d
Page 117 and 118:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Theory andpra
Page 119 and 120:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013productioncos
Page 121 and 122: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Providing a l
Page 123 and 124: Thesis Keith Gale 2013and became a
Page 125 and 126: Thesis Keith Gale 2013that intimate
Page 127 and 128: Thesis Keith Gale 20135.5 Case stud
Page 129 and 130: Thesis Keith Gale 20135.5.6 Alignme
Page 131 and 132: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 5.2: Ex
Page 133 and 134: Thesis Keith Gale 2013An investigat
Page 135 and 136: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Figure 5.3: M
Page 137 and 138: Thesis Keith Gale 2013organisation.
Page 139 and 140: Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 6: DA
Page 141 and 142: Thesis Keith Gale 2013until August
Page 143 and 144: Thesis Keith Gale 2013quarterly per
Page 145 and 146: Thesis Keith Gale 2013professional
Page 147 and 148: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 7.3: te
Page 149 and 150: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Section 3 of
Page 151 and 152: Thesis Keith Gale 2013proportionall
Page 153 and 154: Thesis Keith Gale 2013right of the
Page 155 and 156: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Figure 7.5: S
Page 157 and 158: Thesis Keith Gale 20137.8 Detailed
Page 159 and 160: Thesis Keith Gale 2013(Audit Commis
Page 161 and 162: Thesis Keith Gale 2013From this inf
Page 163 and 164: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Agreed works
Page 165 and 166: Thesis Keith Gale 2013The percentag
Page 167 and 168: Thesis Keith Gale 20137.12 Analysis
Page 169 and 170: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 7.10: P
Page 171: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Independent s
Page 175 and 176: Thesis Keith Gale 20137.15.4 Interp
Page 177 and 178: Thesis Keith Gale 2013independent v
Page 179 and 180: Thesis Keith Gale 20137.17 Interpre
Page 181 and 182: Thesis Keith Gale 2013difference in
Page 183 and 184: Thesis Keith Gale 2013contract valu
Page 185 and 186: Thesis Keith Gale 2013H1 proposes t
Page 187 and 188: Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 8: FI
Page 189 and 190: Thesis Keith Gale 2013of variances
Page 191 and 192: Thesis Keith Gale 20138.4 Compariso
Page 193 and 194: Thesis Keith Gale 2013• Feasibili
Page 195 and 196: Thesis Keith Gale 20138.7 Analysis
Page 197 and 198: Thesis Keith Gale 2013In order to s
Page 199 and 200: Thesis Keith Gale 2013and 1 to repr
Page 201 and 202: Thesis Keith Gale 2013costs could b
Page 203 and 204: Thesis Keith Gale 2013to an alterna
Page 205 and 206: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Figure 8.3: T
Page 207 and 208: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 8.5: Gr
Page 209 and 210: Thesis Keith Gale 20138.16 Action r
Page 211 and 212: Thesis Keith Gale 2013the action re
Page 213 and 214: Thesis Keith Gale 2013supplier). A
Page 215 and 216: Thesis Keith Gale 20139.2 Questionn
Page 217 and 218: Thesis Keith Gale 20139.4 Sociologi
Page 219 and 220: Thesis Keith Gale 2013A review of r
Page 221 and 222: Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 9.5: St
Page 223 and 224:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013points in the
Page 225 and 226:
Thesis Keith Gale 20139.9.1 Views c
Page 227 and 228:
Thesis Keith Gale 20139.9.3 Views c
Page 229 and 230:
Thesis Keith Gale 20135% Trimmed Me
Page 231 and 232:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Commentary up
Page 233 and 234:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Figure 9.7: N
Page 235 and 236:
Thesis Keith Gale 20139.11 Identifi
Page 237 and 238:
Thesis Keith Gale 20139.11.1 Views
Page 239 and 240:
Thesis Keith Gale 20139.11.3 Views
Page 241 and 242:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013and meaningfu
Page 243 and 244:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Figure 9.12:
Page 245 and 246:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 9.15: R
Page 247 and 248:
Thesis Keith Gale 20139.17 Summary
Page 249 and 250:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013qualification
Page 251 and 252:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013include hesit
Page 253 and 254:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 10.1: S
Page 255 and 256:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013• Filtering
Page 257 and 258:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Figure 10.3:
Page 259 and 260:
Thesis Keith Gale 201310.6.4 Themat
Page 261 and 262:
Thesis Keith Gale 201310.6.5 Themat
Page 263 and 264:
Thesis Keith Gale 201310.7 Qualitat
Page 265 and 266:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013frameworks -
Page 267 and 268:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Support for l
Page 269 and 270:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013‘I think th
Page 271 and 272:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Within the ge
Page 273 and 274:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Construct val
Page 275 and 276:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013in this chapt
Page 277 and 278:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013• the hypot
Page 279 and 280:
Thesis Keith Gale 201311.4 Validati
Page 281 and 282:
Thesis Keith Gale 201311.5 Validati
Page 283 and 284:
Thesis Keith Gale 201311.5.4 Induct
Page 285 and 286:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Table 11.2: S
Page 287 and 288:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013‘…you’v
Page 289 and 290:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013are consisten
Page 291 and 292:
Thesis Keith Gale 201311.9 Sharing
Page 293 and 294:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013CHAPTER 12: C
Page 295 and 296:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013that integrat
Page 297 and 298:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013took the oppo
Page 299 and 300:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013The impact of
Page 301 and 302:
Thesis Keith Gale 201312.5.3 Releva
Page 303 and 304:
Thesis Keith Gale 201312.5.4 Releva
Page 305 and 306:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013environment,
Page 307 and 308:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Confidence wi
Page 309 and 310:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Ankrah, N. A.
Page 311 and 312:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Bogdan, R.C.
Page 313 and 314:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Carr, R.I. (1
Page 315 and 316:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Cresswell, J.
Page 317 and 318:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Drexler, J.A.
Page 319 and 320:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Flyvbjerg, B.
Page 321 and 322:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Greenhalgh, T
Page 323 and 324:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Hoxley, M. (2
Page 325 and 326:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Kvale, S. (19
Page 327 and 328:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Loosemore, M.
Page 329 and 330:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Mohamed, S. (
Page 331 and 332:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013OED (2007). S
Page 333 and 334:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Punch, K.F. (
Page 335 and 336:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Runeson, G.R.
Page 337 and 338:
Thesis Keith Gale 2013Tourangeau, R
Page 339 and 340:
Appendices to Thesis Keith Gale 201
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475:
show all

PhD Final Thesis April 2013.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?