PhD Final Thesis April 2013.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Thesis Keith Gale 20137.15.2 Interpretation for CSF1B – Finishing on time:Eta squared for CSF1B = -2.134²-2.134² + (60 + 104 – 2)Eta squared for CSF1B = 0.0273An independent t-test was used to compare the ‘finishing on time’ critical successfactor scores for discrete verses framework projects. There was a difference inscores for discrete projects (M=0.130, SD=0.047) and framework projects(M=0.145, SD=0.041), t (162) =-2.134, p=0.034). The magnitude of the differencesin the means was small to moderate (0.027).7.15.3 Interpretation for CSF2 – Accuracy of payments:Eta squared for CSF2 = -19.857²-19.857² + (60 + 104 – 2)Eta squared for CSF2 = 0.709An independent t-test was used to compare the ‘accuracy of payments’ criticalsuccess factor scores for discrete verses framework projects. There was a significantdifference in scores for discrete projects (M=0.1073, SD=0.054) and frameworkprojects (M=0.2510, SD=0.038), t (162) =-19.857, p=0.000). The magnitude of thedifferences in the means is a large effect (0.709).154