PhD Final Thesis April 2013.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Thesis Keith Gale 20137.17.3 Interpretation for CSF2 – Accuracy of payments:Eta squared for CSF2 = -14.563²-14.563² + (60 + 60 – 2)Eta squared for CSF2 = 0.643An independent samples t-test was used to compare the ‘accuracy of payments’critical success factor scores for discrete verses framework projects. There was asignificant difference in scores for discrete projects (M=0.1073, SD=0.054) andframework projects (M=0.2397, SD=0.045), t (118) =-14.563, p=0.000). Themagnitude of the differences in the means is a large effect (0.643).7.17.4 Interpretation for CSF3 – Right first time:Eta squared for CSF3 = -2.971²-2.971² + (60 + 60 – 2)Eta squared for CSF3 = 0.070An independent samples t-test was used to compare the ‘right first time’ criticalsuccess factor scores for discrete verses framework projects. There was a significantdifference in scores for discrete projects (M=0.123, SD=0.098) and frameworkprojects (M=0.170, SD=0.072), t (118) =-2.971, p=0.004). The magnitude of thedifferences in the means was moderate (0.070).7.17.5 Interpretation for CSF4 – Health and safety inspections:Eta squared for CSF4 = -4.277²-4.277² + (60 + 60 – 2)Eta squared for CSF4 = 0.134An independent samples t-test was used to compare the ‘health and safety inspection’critical success factor scores for discrete verses framework projects. There was a160