13.07.2015 Views

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

001CHAPTER 22Education for All Global Monitoring ReportOn currenttrends,710 million adultswill still lackbasic literacyskills in 2015.32. See note forFigure 2.35 for how<strong>the</strong> literacy target hasbeen measured.Figure 2.33: Contrasting experiences in reducing illiteracyand <strong>the</strong> associated gender gap in four countriesAge illiteracy profile in selected countries, by age group and gender, 2007Illiteracy rates (%)Illiteracy rates (%)10080604020010080604020075-84 65-74 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 15-24Age groupsBangladesh, maleBangladesh, femaleIndia, femaleIndia, maleChina, femaleChina, male75-84 65-74 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 15-24Source: UIS database.Age groupsMorocco, femaleMorocco, maleindigenous-language speakers at 21% of adultscompared with 4% for Spanish-speakers (Cuetoet al., 2009). In South Asia, literacy gaps betweenlower and higher castes are pronounced. In Nepal,caste disparities are even larger than wealthand gender disparities (Nepal Ministry of Educationand Sports and UNESCO Kathmandu, 2007).Disparities linked to location. Illiteracy tends tobe higher in poorer regions, rural areas and slums.Regional disparities often mirror national povertymaps. For example, in Brazil some of <strong>the</strong> pooreststates in <strong>the</strong> north-east – Alagoas, Maranhão,Paraíba and Piauí – have illiteracy levels twice ashigh as in <strong>the</strong> south-east (The George WashingtonUniversity, 2006). In India, <strong>the</strong> regional spectrumextends from almost no illiteracy in <strong>the</strong> stateof Mizoram to 50% illiteracy in Rajasthan (IndiaMinistry of Human Resource Development andNational University of Educational Planning andAdministration, 2008). Rural areas often lag farbehind urban areas (Kinsella and He, 2009).In Pakistan, urban literacy rates are twice as highas <strong>the</strong> rural average. Within urban areas illiteracytends to be concentrated in informal settlementscharacterized by high levels of poverty (PakistanMinistry of Education, 2008).None of <strong>the</strong>se disadvantages exists in isolation.Being female is a near-universal indicator for loweraverage literacy in many Arab states and most ofSouth and West Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Butgender disadvantage is compounded by poverty,location and ethnicity (Figure 2.34). The wealth gapin <strong>the</strong> Philippines is particularly marked: women in<strong>the</strong> poorest households have literacy rates averaging65%, compared with over 96% for women in <strong>the</strong>wealthiest households. In South Africa, white youthand adult women have near-universal literacy levels,compared with just 70% literacy among blackwomen. In Mexico, women who only speak anindigenous language are about fifteen times lesslikely to be literate than women who only speakSpanish, and women lacking a knowledge ofSpanish have literacy levels of just 5%. Literacyrates among Cambodian women living in Ratanakiri,a province dominated by indigenous hill tribes, arejust over a third of those among women in <strong>the</strong>capital, Phnom Penh.Prospects for achieving <strong>the</strong> 2015 targetCurrent trends in adult literacy will leave <strong>the</strong> worldshort of <strong>the</strong> target set for 2015. 32 Progress has beenso slow that <strong>the</strong> target is out of reach. Even in abest-case scenario, not enough children will enteradulthood literate over <strong>the</strong> next five years to halve<strong>the</strong> level of illiteracy. Continuing on <strong>the</strong> current trendwill leave a very large gap with <strong>the</strong> Dakar promise.Projections provided for <strong>the</strong> <strong>EFA</strong> Global MonitoringReport <strong>2010</strong> give a ballpark estimate of <strong>the</strong> scaleof shortfall: by 2015 <strong>the</strong> adult illiteracy rate will havefallen between 29% and 34% in <strong>the</strong> three regionswith <strong>the</strong> highest rates. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, between halfand two-thirds of <strong>the</strong> journey to <strong>the</strong> 50% illiteracyreduction target will have been completed.There is a very real human cost associated with<strong>the</strong> gap. On <strong>the</strong> current course, an estimated710 million adults – 13% of <strong>the</strong> world’s adults – willstill lack basic literacy skills in 2015. Regional gapsbetween target and projected outcome are largestfor South and West Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and<strong>the</strong> Arab States (Figure 2.35). Failure to achieve <strong>the</strong>Dakar adult literacy goal will translate into verylarge deficits for many countries. In India <strong>the</strong> targetwill be missed on current trends by around 81 million100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!