13.07.2015 Views

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0120CHAPTER 3Education for All Global Monitoring ReportExtreme andpersistentdeprivation ineducation carriesa high pricefor societiesas well as forindividualsArticle 28). The right to equal opportunity foreducation is also enshrined in most countries’national laws and constitutions. Indeed, fewhuman rights are more widely endorsed – andmore widely violated.Millions of children are denied <strong>the</strong>ir human rightto education for <strong>the</strong> simple reason that <strong>the</strong>irparents cannot afford to keep <strong>the</strong>m in school.Social and cultural barriers to education formano<strong>the</strong>r formidable obstacle. In many countries,<strong>the</strong> education of girls is widely perceived as beingof less value than that of boys, with traditionalpractices such as early marriage adding ano<strong>the</strong>rlayer of disadvantage. Members of ethnic minoritiesoften face deeply entrenched obstacles to equalopportunity. Denied an opportunity to learn in <strong>the</strong>irown language and faced with social stigmatization,<strong>the</strong>y are set on an early pathway to disadvantage.Millions of children with disabilities across <strong>the</strong>world also face far more restricted opportunitiesthan <strong>the</strong>ir peers, as do children living in regionsaffected by conflict.None of <strong>the</strong>se disadvantages operates in isolation.Poverty, gender, ethnicity and o<strong>the</strong>r characteristicsinteract to create overlapping and self-reinforcinglayers of disadvantage that limit opportunity andhamper social mobility.The interaction between marginalization ineducation and wider patterns of marginalizationoperates in both directions. Being educated isa vital human capability that enables people tomake choices in areas that matter. The lack ofan education restricts choices. It limits <strong>the</strong> scopepeople have for influencing decisions that affect<strong>the</strong>ir lives. People lacking literacy and numeracyskills face a heightened risk of poverty, insecureemployment and ill health. Poverty and ill health,in turn, contribute to marginalization in education.So does <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> <strong>marginalized</strong> have onlya weak voice in shaping political decisionsaffecting <strong>the</strong>ir lives.<strong>Reaching</strong> <strong>marginalized</strong> children requires politicalcommitment backed by practical policies. Whengovernments met in 1990 at <strong>the</strong> World Conferenceon Education for All in Jomtien, Thailand, <strong>the</strong>yrecognized <strong>the</strong> need to overcome extremeinequalities holding back progress in education.They declared that ‘consistent measures must betaken to reduce disparities’ and called for activecommitment to reach ‘underserved groups’,including <strong>the</strong> poor, remote rural populations,ethnic, racial and linguistic minorities, refugeesand migrants, and those affected by conflict(UNESCO, 1990, Article 3). The Dakar Frameworkfor Action reaffirmed <strong>the</strong> commitment to ‘explicitlyidentify, target and respond flexibly to <strong>the</strong> needsand circumstances of <strong>the</strong> poorest and <strong>the</strong> most<strong>marginalized</strong>’ (UNESCO, 2000, IV, para. 52).While some countries have made impressiveefforts to back up such words by extendingeducational opportunities to <strong>the</strong>ir most<strong>marginalized</strong> populations, action has generallyfallen far short of <strong>the</strong> commitments made atJomtien and Dakar. Marginalization has remaineda peripheral concern. The assumption has beenthat national progress in education wouldeventually trickle down to <strong>the</strong> most disadvantaged.After a decade of steady but uneven nationalprogress, it is time to abandon that assumption.In many countries, large swa<strong>the</strong>s of societyare being left behind as a result of inheriteddisadvantages. Breaking down <strong>the</strong>sedisadvantages will require a far stronger focuson <strong>the</strong> hard to reach.Tackling marginalization is a matter of urgencyon several counts. The targets for 2015 adoptedin <strong>the</strong> Dakar Framework for Action – includinguniversal primary education – will not beachieved unless governments step up <strong>the</strong>irefforts to reach <strong>the</strong> <strong>marginalized</strong>. Sustainingprogress in basic education and creating <strong>the</strong>foundations for advances in secondary educationwill require a renewed drive to extendopportunity to individuals and groups facing<strong>the</strong> most deeply entrenched disadvantages.Progress in combating marginalization ineducation would dramatically improve <strong>the</strong>discouraging scenario that Chapter 2 describes.The case for action on marginalization goesbeyond <strong>the</strong> 2015 targets. Extreme and persistentdeprivation in education carries a high pricefor societies as well as for individuals. In <strong>the</strong>increasingly knowledge-based and competitive<strong>global</strong> economy, depriving people of opportunitiesfor education is a prescription for wastage of skills,talent and opportunities for innovation andeconomic growth. It is also a recipe for socialdivision. Marginalization in education is animportant factor in <strong>the</strong> widening of social andeconomic inequalities. Working towards moreinclusive education is a condition for <strong>the</strong>development of more inclusive societies.136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!