13.07.2015 Views

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE AID COMPACT: FALLING SHORT OF COMMITMENTSAid for educationBox 4.4: Spain: political will behind increased aid to basic educationThe rapid emergence of Spain as a major donorhas given important impetus to <strong>the</strong> widerinternational aid effort. It has backed its increasedaid flows with a stronger commitment to equity,especially in education.Spanish aid has undergone a remarkabletransformation since 2000. The aid-to-GNI ratiohas doubled to reach 0.43%. Spain’s rapideconomic growth means this translates into alarge increase in real financial transfers. Moreover,an initially narrow focus (on Latin America) hasbroadened, and <strong>the</strong> country has curtailed its tyingof aid to Spanish exports and commercial interests.Since <strong>the</strong> adoption of <strong>the</strong> Second Master Plan(2005–2008) <strong>the</strong>re has been a much strongerfocus on poverty reduction. The plan, which took<strong>the</strong> Millennium Development Goals as its keyreference point, set out a detailed strategy foraligning a wide range of policies and ministriesbehind Spain’s development cooperation goals.wider strategy for achieving <strong>the</strong> MillenniumDevelopment Goals, Germany has responded torequests from national governments to scale upsupport for skills development as a means ofraising wages and tackling youth unemployment(German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperationand Development, 2009). German aid plays animportant role in supporting <strong>the</strong> reform of technicaland vocational education, and <strong>the</strong>re is scope foro<strong>the</strong>r donors to follow <strong>the</strong> lead provided. The widerchallenge for all donors is to find <strong>the</strong> right balance.In countries where poverty remains a huge obstacleto achieving universal primary education, <strong>the</strong> casefor investing <strong>the</strong> bulk of scarce aid resources inhigher education that overwhelmingly benefithigher-income students is not credible.Emerging donors, private givingand innovative financeOECD-DAC members continue to dominateinternational development assistance. Butimportant new sources of aid are emerging, someof which could give a significant boost to education.Overall aid from countries that are not DACmembers is on a strong upward trend. While oftenreferred to as ‘emerging donors’, many membersof this diverse group have a long history of providingThe plan placed Education for All squarely at <strong>the</strong>centre of <strong>the</strong> aid agenda. At <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> WorldEducation Forum, Spain directed most of its aid toeducation towards <strong>the</strong> tertiary level. Since Dakar,it has not only increased <strong>the</strong> level of aid but hasshifted it in favour of basic education. Total aidcommitments to education grew from an annualaverage of US$268 million in 1999–2000 toUS$316 million in 2006–2007, an 18% expansion.Over <strong>the</strong> same period, total aid to basic educationincreased by 79% to US$144 million, or just underhalf of Spain’s total aid to education.Leadership by <strong>the</strong> Spanish Government could playan important role in renewing and revitalizing <strong>the</strong>education aid agenda. In <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>2010</strong>,Spain assumes <strong>the</strong> presidency of <strong>the</strong> European Union.Spain is well placed to call on o<strong>the</strong>r EU membersto demonstrate a stronger commitment to aid foreducation, including a commitment to greater equitybetween sectors.Sources: Manzanedo and Vélaz de Medrano (2009);OECD-DAC (2009d).aid to developing countries. In 2007, aid fromnon-DAC donors <strong>report</strong>ing to DAC 15 amountedto US$5.6 billion – four times <strong>the</strong> level in 1999.The largest emerging donor is Saudi Arabia, whichspent US$2.1 billion on aid in 2007. Aid from Brazilhas been estimated at US$437 million and thatfrom India at US$1 billion. Official data are notavailable for China, but estimates point to a totalChinese aid budget of US$1-1.5 billion in 2006(OECD-DAC, 2009c).Strong economic growth, <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> externalbalances available to major economies such asBrazil, China and India, and growing cooperationin areas such as trade and energy could drivea sustained expansion in aid from non-OECDcountries. This makes it all <strong>the</strong> more important toimprove <strong>the</strong> flow of information and coordinationbetween all donors (Manning, 2006). Achievingthat outcome will require a broadening of aidgovernance structures, which need to be reformedto ensure that <strong>the</strong> views of emerging donors aretaken into account when developing policies andidentifying priorities.Too little is known about <strong>the</strong> composition of non-DAC donors’ aid portfolios to assess <strong>the</strong>ir aid toeducation. China has supported school constructionLeadership by<strong>the</strong> SpanishGovernment couldplay an importantrole in renewingand revitalizing<strong>the</strong> education aidagenda15. Including <strong>the</strong> CzechRepublic, Hungary, Iceland,Israel, Kuwait, Poland, <strong>the</strong>Republic of Korea, SaudiArabia, <strong>the</strong> Slovak Republic,Turkey and <strong>the</strong> United ArabEmirates.231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!