13.07.2015 Views

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE <strong>EFA</strong> GOALSThe quality of educationCross-country inequalitiesand achievement deficitsWhile significant gaps remain, more and morecountries are participating in <strong>global</strong> and regionalassessment exercises that make it possible tomeasure disparities between countries in termsof <strong>the</strong> skills students attain after a given periodof learning.The fourth cycle of Trends in InternationalMa<strong>the</strong>matics and Science Study (TIMSS),conducted in 2007 among eighth grade students,shows large gaps in learning achievement betweencountries (Figure 2.36). One way of looking at <strong>the</strong>segaps is to consider <strong>the</strong> range of results. Averagetest scores for students in <strong>the</strong> Republic of Korea,<strong>the</strong> top-performing country, were almost twiceas high as for students in Ghana, at <strong>the</strong> bottomof <strong>the</strong> league. Viewed from a different vantagepoint, <strong>the</strong> average student in El Salvador, Ghana,Indonesia and Morocco figures alongside orbelow <strong>the</strong> poorest-performing 10% of studentsin higher-performing countries.Few of <strong>the</strong> poorest developing countriesparticipated in TIMSS 2007. Researchers haveattempted to address this limitation byreconfiguring scores from wider test exercises.The results confirm that low-income countries lagfar behind o<strong>the</strong>rs in learning achievement (Altinok,2008; Hanushek and Woessmann, 2009). Oneassessment in India, conducted in <strong>the</strong> states ofOrissa and Rajasthan during 2005, used questionsfrom TIMSS to see how students in <strong>the</strong>se statescompared with those in countries participating in<strong>the</strong> original TIMSS survey (Das and Zajonc, 2008).The results showed that ninth grade students inOrissa and Rajasthan ranked alongside studentsfrom <strong>the</strong> poorest-performing TIMSS countries.Learning assessments allow for more thanrelative measurement. TIMSS establishes a seriesof performance thresholds aimed at measuringstudent capabilities. At <strong>the</strong> low end (scores of400 or less), students have only <strong>the</strong> most basicknowledge of whole numbers, decimals and basicgraphs. At <strong>the</strong> upper end (over 550), students canapply <strong>the</strong>ir understanding and knowledge in avariety of complex situations. In eighteen of <strong>the</strong>countries covered, including Botswana, Egypt andSaudi Arabia, <strong>the</strong> average student performs below<strong>the</strong> low threshold (Figure 2.36). This points toThere are largegaps in learningachievementbetween countriesFigure 2.36: There are large gaps in learning achievement across countriesDistribution of TIMSS ma<strong>the</strong>matics scale score for eighth grade students in 2007800700OECD O<strong>the</strong>r high income Middle and low incomeAbove <strong>the</strong>TIMSS highinternationalbenchmark600TIMSS ma<strong>the</strong>matics scale score50040030095th90th50th percentile20010th5th1000Rep. of KoreaJapanHungaryEngland (U. K.)United StatesCzech Rep.AustraliaSwedenScotland (U. K.)ItalyNorwaySingaporeSloveniaMaltaCyprusIsraelBahrainOmanKuwaitSaudi ArabiaQatarRussian Fed.LithuaniaArmeniaSerbiaMalaysiaBulgariaUkraineRomaniaBosnia/Herzeg.LebanonThailandJordanTurkeyTunisiaGeorgiaIran, Isl. Rep.IndonesiaSyrian A. R.EgyptAlgeriaColombiaMoroccoPalestinian A. T.BotswanaEl SalvadorGhanaBelow <strong>the</strong>TIMSS lowinternationalbenchmarkNotes: The markers show <strong>the</strong> scale score of <strong>the</strong> indicated percentile. The fiftieth percentile is <strong>the</strong> median score for <strong>the</strong> country. This represents <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> distribution,with 50% of students scoring above and below <strong>the</strong> median. Low benchmark – students have some knowledge of whole numbers and decimals, operations and basic graphs.High benchmark – students can organise and draw conclusions from information, make generalizations and solve non-routine problems.Source: Mullis et al. (2008).105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!