13.07.2015 Views

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

010CHAPTER 42Education for All Global Monitoring ReportThereconstructionof educationsystems incountriesemerging fromconflict can playa vital role inunderpinningpeace, rebuildinglives and laying<strong>the</strong> foundationsfor stability16. The countries includedare ones that experiencedarmed conflicts resultingin at least twenty-fivebattle-related deaths peryear over at least threeyears between 1999 and2007 or more than1,000 battle-relateddeaths in at least one yearduring <strong>the</strong> same period.Of <strong>the</strong>se, only countriescategorized as leastdeveloped countries by<strong>the</strong> United Nations orlow-income countries by<strong>the</strong> World Bank in 2007were included.17. These twentycountries account for 56%of those out of school inlow-income countries.Aid to conflict-affected countriesLow-income countries affected by conflict pose someof <strong>the</strong> greatest challenges for aid partnerships.People living in <strong>the</strong>se countries need help to rebuild<strong>the</strong>ir livelihoods, health and education systems. Yetfor donors, working with conflict-affected countriesis difficult and often dangerous.Analysis of <strong>the</strong> role of aid to education in conflictaffectedstates is not straightforward. There isno agreed definition or list of such states. Even ifa list could be agreed, <strong>the</strong> status of <strong>the</strong> countrieson it would vary enormously. The situation in <strong>the</strong>Darfur region of <strong>the</strong> Sudan is not <strong>the</strong> same as thatof Helmand Province in Afghanistan. Some prefer<strong>the</strong> broader term ‘fragile states’ to encompasscountries affected by conflict and those facingwider governance challenges, but this does littleto add clarity: almost all low-income countriesare fragile in some way.There is broad agreement, however, that conflicthas had devastating consequences for education inmany poor countries, affecting millions of children.Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are injured or traumatized bybombing in Gaza, living in camps for displacedpeople in Sri Lanka or recruited as child soldiers innor<strong>the</strong>rn Uganda, children are never immune to <strong>the</strong>impact of conflict. Nei<strong>the</strong>r are education systems.Warring factions often destroy schools and targetteachers, and education suffers badly when conflictleads to a collapse of governance.Childhood disrupted as a result of conflict is difficultto mend. Yet education can provide children andyouth with protection, a safe space and hope for <strong>the</strong>future. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of educationsystems in countries emerging from conflict canplay a vital role in underpinning peace, rebuildinglives and laying <strong>the</strong> foundations for stability (Aguilarand Retamal, 2009). The experience of Sierra Leonedemonstrates what is possible, while <strong>the</strong> failureto rebuild education in <strong>the</strong> Democratic Republicof <strong>the</strong> Congo demonstrates <strong>the</strong> corrosive effectof slow social reconstruction on peace processes.Most donors recognize <strong>the</strong> importance ofsupporting education in conflict-affected countries.Yet <strong>the</strong>y face difficult policy dilemmas. Donors wantaid to be effective, so <strong>the</strong>y focus on conditions suchas country ownership, macroeconomic stability andgood governance. Few countries emerging fromconflict are in a position to meet <strong>the</strong>se conditions.In addition, maintaining access to education duringhumanitarian emergencies is enormously difficult.Such considerations help explain <strong>the</strong> highlyunequal, volatile and poorly coordinated patternof aid delivery to conflict-affected countries.Yet adequate education provision in <strong>the</strong>se countrieswill not be achieved without scaling up aid.Monitoring aid to conflict-affected countriesHow do countries affected by conflict fare inattracting aid, in comparison with o<strong>the</strong>r countries?This Report addresses <strong>the</strong> question by focusingon twenty poor countries meeting establishedcriteria for classification as conflict-affected(Harbom and Wallensteen, 2009; Uppsala ConflictData Program, 2009). 16The diversity of <strong>the</strong> group underlines <strong>the</strong>problems in defining conflict-affected countries.Those covered include countries such as Liberiaand Rwanda that have embarked on successfulpost-conflict recovery strategies, countries thathave faced localized conflict (Senegal and Uganda)or far broader conflict (Côte d’Ivoire), and thosesuch as Afghanistan where reconstruction istaking place amid continued instability.The impact of conflict on educational access isclear. Taken collectively, <strong>the</strong>se twenty countriesaccount for about one in three children who areout of school. 17 In many cases, national data makeit difficult to establish <strong>the</strong> full consequences ofconflict. For example, <strong>the</strong>re are no reliableestimates of <strong>the</strong> out-of-school population in Darfur.In o<strong>the</strong>r cases, national data can obscure <strong>the</strong> extentof conflict-related damage to education. WhileUganda has made strong national progress towardsuniversal primary education, several nor<strong>the</strong>rndistricts affected by conflict have been left behind.While aid to conflict-affected poor countries isrising from a low base, it still falls far short ofwhat is needed. For 2006–2007, just under one-fifthof overall aid to education and one-quarter of aidto basic education went to conflict-affected poorcountries (Figure 4.13). Data limitations makeit difficult to provide an accurate assessmentof <strong>the</strong> levels of aid required for education in<strong>the</strong>se countries. Indicative estimates for thisReport put <strong>the</strong> basic education financing gap inconflict-affected poor countries at approximatelyUS$7 billion or 41% of <strong>the</strong> total gap for low-incomecountries (Education Policy and Data Center andUNESCO, 2009). This is substantially more than <strong>the</strong>US$1.2 billion of aid for basic education committedto <strong>the</strong>se countries in 2006-2007.240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!