13.07.2015 Views

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

Reaching the marginalized: EFA global monitoring report, 2010; 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE <strong>EFA</strong> GOALSThe quality of educationMiddle and low-incomePolandLatviaCroatiaLithuaniaTurkeyChileRussian Fed.UruguayBulgariaMexicoThailandArgentinaSerbiaJordanBrazilColombiaRomaniaMontenegroTunisiaIndonesiaAzerbaijanKyrgyzstanDisparities in learning tend to be much widerin low-income countries, with some of <strong>the</strong>widest disparities found in Arab states. In Yemen,<strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> best and worstperformers is 368 scale points, or 165% of <strong>the</strong>mean score of 224. A study of ma<strong>the</strong>maticsachievement in <strong>the</strong> Indian states of Orissa andRajasthan found that <strong>the</strong> range in test scoresbetween <strong>the</strong> best and worst performers was widerthan for all TIMSS countries except South Africa(Das and Zajonc, 2008). 37Differences between schools play a critical rolein <strong>the</strong> level of equity within education systems,as evidence from <strong>the</strong> OECD countries shows.Measured on a <strong>global</strong> scale, <strong>the</strong>se countries haverelatively low overall levels of inequality in learningachievement. Where <strong>the</strong>y differ is in <strong>the</strong> shareof inequality that can be traced back to schools.In Nordic countries such as Finland, Iceland andNorway, less than 10% of <strong>the</strong> variation in sciencescores is explained by school differences. At <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r end of <strong>the</strong> scale, such differences accountfor over half <strong>the</strong> variation in test scores in Germany(Figure 2.41). 38 Such findings demonstrate <strong>the</strong>degree to which school-based factors can widen –or narrow – learning achievement gaps.10080604020020406080100Highest benchmark achieved (% of students)Box 2.22: Gender parity and learning achievementIn many countries, girls are less likely than boys to get into school.Once in school, though, <strong>the</strong>y tend to perform as well as, or better than,<strong>the</strong>ir male classmates. While <strong>the</strong>re are important gender-baseddifferences in learning achievement by subject, learning achievementin general is not characterized by deep inequalities.OECD countries. In PISA 2006, average reading scores for15-year-old girls were 8% higher than those of boys throughout<strong>the</strong> OECD. In ma<strong>the</strong>matics, boys held an advantage over girls.The widest gap was found in Austria, where males’ test scores wereon average 5% higher. Gender differences in science tended to bestatistically insignificant.Arab States. TIMSS 2007 covered thirteen of <strong>the</strong> twenty Arab States.In most of <strong>the</strong>m, grade 8 girls outperformed boys in ma<strong>the</strong>matics.In Qatar, girls’ test scores were 13% higher than boys’. A similarnumber of countries recorded a female advantage in science, withlarger gender gaps in many cases. In Qatar, girls scored on average25% higher than boys.Central and Eastern Europe. PISA 2006 covered fifteen of <strong>the</strong>twenty-one countries in this region. All registered a large femaleadvantage in reading performance. In most, gender gaps inma<strong>the</strong>matics were statistically insignificant; in <strong>the</strong> remainingcountries boys tended to do slightly better than girls.Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean. Information from sixteen countriesin <strong>the</strong> 2006 SERCE assessment in ma<strong>the</strong>matics shows that boys in<strong>the</strong> sixth grade performed better than girls. When reading wasassessed, girls outperformed boys, but in both subjects <strong>the</strong> averagedifferences were small.Sub-Saharan Africa. Among Francophone countries participatingin <strong>the</strong> PASEC assessment, <strong>the</strong>re were no large gender differencesin second and fifth grade performance in French or ma<strong>the</strong>matics.For <strong>the</strong> thirteen countries participating in <strong>the</strong> 2000–2002 SACMEQassessments, gender differences in sixth grade English were on <strong>the</strong>whole ei<strong>the</strong>r statistically insignificant or small. 1 In ma<strong>the</strong>matics, abouthalf <strong>the</strong> participating countries showed no statistically significantgender difference. In <strong>the</strong> rest, males’ average scores tended to behigher but <strong>the</strong> differences were not large. 2These findings confirm that gender gaps in overall achievement aremodest. Where differences do exist, <strong>the</strong> data show that, except in <strong>the</strong>Arab States, girls do better in languages and boys in ma<strong>the</strong>matics andscience. Eliminating remaining gaps will be necessary if <strong>the</strong> goal ofeducation for all is to be achieved. However, it has to be recognizedthat current data provide an incomplete picture, especially for countriesthat do not participate in international and regional assessments.1. Seychelles was <strong>the</strong> exception, where girls’ performance in English comparedwith that of boys was 0.65 of a standard deviation higher.2. Seychelles was again <strong>the</strong> exception, where girls’ performance in ma<strong>the</strong>maticscompared with that of boys was 0.38 of a standard deviation higher.Sources: Bonnet (2009); Ma (2007); Mullis et al. (2008); OECD (2007b).37. The study compares test scores of students at <strong>the</strong> fifthand ninety-fifth percentile of <strong>the</strong> test score distribution.38. The overall dispersion of test scores in Germany is 110% of<strong>the</strong> OECD average, compared with 81% in Finland (OECD, 2007b).109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!