04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Deploying resources<br />

The deployment of physical resources arising from merger was, as we<br />

have seen, an important issue for the CWU in that the Instrument of<br />

Amalgamation committed the new union to a new headquarters.<br />

Evidence cited above from the union’s video shows how managers saw<br />

the move as being one which was of importance in bringing people<br />

together, because the two unions had not yet merged in culture and<br />

style. This attitude was shared by other managers:-<br />

I think the one element of management strategy that we did<br />

have from day one, which was right and which was good, was<br />

that we would get into a single building as soon as possible<br />

because until you got into the single building you couldn't<br />

integrate the cultures and it's the cultures that keep the<br />

processes separate (Interviewee G)<br />

We took the principled view, the truthful view, that we should get<br />

rid of what we saw as the repository of the two cultures and try<br />

and find a new headquarters which hopefully would be<br />

equidistant between the two old headquarters. (Interviewee O)<br />

It is to some extent a truism to say that they saw the new building as<br />

something which brought staff together – of course it did - but as in<br />

other unions, managers in the CWU were aware of the concept of<br />

culture and its importance for the new organisation. So there were a<br />

number of critical feelings about what actually happened:-<br />

We weren't using the new building as a way to impose a new<br />

culture. Because some organisations do that, don't they? If<br />

they've got a new building they see an opportunity because a<br />

building can actually influence management style and all sorts of<br />

things. I know for instance BP deliberately went open plan to<br />

encourage networking - the building was designed to influence<br />

the management. We didn't have any vision when it came to it. It<br />

was just a case of trying to get us into one building. (Interviewee<br />

J)<br />

The one thing that I regret is that the union did not use it (the<br />

move) as an opportunity to use the space to start changing<br />

cultures (Interviewee K)<br />

The departments which involved the bringing together of staff<br />

included the Research Department where we thought that we<br />

had already got a common style of working. At the other extreme<br />

was the Legal Department which not only were moving two<br />

groups together but moved them at different times, which I think<br />

was a cultural disaster (Interviewee L)<br />

Management of the union in the interim between merger and the move<br />

into the new building had been culturally problematic:-<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!