04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Deploying resources<br />

the different parts, big and small of the organisation to influence<br />

the outcome of the process. Their influence is always going to<br />

be smaller and so, you know, if as an organisation you've got a<br />

limited number of objectives and a limited number of priorities,<br />

there is a big question about how you can meet the needs of<br />

minority interests inside the organisation. But some people<br />

would argue that that's what management is all about. It is<br />

about the allocation of scarce resources and if we try to meet<br />

everybody's needs and aspirations, then we're going to fail and<br />

the big decision, the big challenge is, you know, -- again an<br />

example. There are 13 national officers working in health, there<br />

are seven in local government. I'm talking about National<br />

secretaries, Senior National Officers. Why is that? Does that<br />

reflect the needs? Does that reflect history? Does that reflect<br />

the influence of that part of the organisation inside the wider<br />

organisation? Is that better lobbying on the part of health and<br />

local government? It needs to be explained in a more rational<br />

way than that. Yes? How do you change that? Where<br />

traditionally people who work in there don't work in there. So all<br />

I'm saying is that these are hugely important management<br />

decisions and they also reflect -- they are not just management<br />

challenges and issues but they also reflect the power of<br />

stakeholders. You know, the ability of parts of the organisation<br />

to lobby effectively. How do you introduce some fairness? And it<br />

maybe that having a transparent way of allocating resources that<br />

is open to scrutiny, which can be justified against the objectives<br />

and priorities, won't change anything. You will still have 13 and<br />

7. But at the moment it's not the product of a rational set of<br />

criteria. But Transport is always going to struggle to command<br />

the same level of resources and priority asLocal Government<br />

(Interviewee H)<br />

This somewhat complex stream of consciousness suggests the<br />

existence of a debate about how to use resource allocation systems to<br />

achieve some degree of fairness, some way in which overall objectives<br />

influence management decisions rather than stakeholder power. The<br />

issue is tackled by other managers similarly using Transport,<br />

UNISON’s smallest service group, as an example:-<br />

It’s trying to make sure that they do get the appropriate level of<br />

service. Because they're smaller than Energy or Water it<br />

doesn't mean to say that we just write them off. One or two of<br />

my colleagues have said, why do we bother with Transport, de<br />

da de da de da. And I say, look, my analogy has been that the<br />

patient's in intensive care and my job is to keep them<br />

functioning. When I am told to switch off that machine, I have to<br />

switch it off but nobody has told me to at the moment and, if I am<br />

asked for my assessment of the patient's condition it might be<br />

my view that the machine should be switched off. But it is a<br />

wider discussion than that, you know. I think, again, ethically<br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!