04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Teams<br />

There are more tools now, the development review process, we<br />

have always done that here and that has been useful. We have<br />

also reorganised twice and we have had staff come and go,<br />

which is unsettling and short-term puts more demands but it has<br />

actually been quite refreshing and I think that has been a good<br />

sign. So we use the development review and I think that's<br />

positive. There is now training that people see that they can<br />

have, as opposed to a wish list that wasn't there and we have<br />

regular unit meetings. People go to lunch. We have a team<br />

away day. It's not rocket science. (Interviewee F)<br />

This is virtually the only evidence relating to staff development and<br />

training in general in the union. In the East Midlands the evidence<br />

seems reliable; in the one area where a training plan is available, just<br />

under 60% of the training budget was unspent in 2001, which is an<br />

indicator only of quantity of training, not quality.<br />

Teams<br />

There have been references on several occasions in this case study to<br />

various teams – management teams in the main but also teams at<br />

regional level. The General Secretary is clear about the national<br />

position on this:-<br />

What we are doing is to change that by bringing in team<br />

working. So we are now within regions, and most regions have<br />

gone over to it (and it's not successful yet), we are bringing<br />

regional officers together as a team and they work together as a<br />

team under a team leader and the team also includes organising<br />

assistants and clerical and secretarial staff. They have got to<br />

keep a diary within those circumstances. They have got to sit<br />

down as a group under a manager and talk about what they are<br />

doing and we can get through to them the priorities on what we<br />

want them to do. There has been a belief in trade unions that<br />

this job has been done for 100 years and we will continue to do<br />

it that way but by bringing in team working under a manager,<br />

you can actually change the job of the regional officer. And<br />

again, we are part of the way through this. I am not saying that<br />

we have done it but we are part of the way through it.<br />

He believes that team working is changing the job of the regional<br />

officer. A reason for that is offered from one region:-<br />

It (scepticism about management) also manifests itself in<br />

working as part of a team because there is kind of an<br />

individualistic culture, not just amongst ROs but generally<br />

amongst staff that working in a team was seen as being<br />

synonymous with being managed and, again, for people to work<br />

as team members you have to see that the team is greater than<br />

the sum of its parts and has a contribution to make. (Interviewee<br />

O)<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!