04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing by information<br />

finalised yet. So we're getting there I like to think a lot quicker<br />

since I have become General Secretary because of a number of<br />

initiatives. Some little things have happened to bring unity. We<br />

used to have two Education Officers, one was ex NCU and one<br />

was ex UCW. We now have got one Head of Education and<br />

Training -- we have just recently appointed L who joined us from<br />

Bectu -- and she is looking to integrate all the education to make<br />

it much more unified. So we are working on it. It has been<br />

painful, as all mergers are and you still get people talking about -<br />

- and I have tried to banish the terms even though I have just<br />

used them myself -- ex UCW and ex NCU -- because we will be<br />

eight years merged in January. It's a long time. Kids talk, walk<br />

and go to school in that period and we have not yet learned to<br />

talk about one union. (Interviewee B)<br />

Managerial tasks<br />

Managing by information<br />

5.12. There is very little evidence that the CWU managers adopted any form<br />

of strategic approach to their communication role and some evidence<br />

to the contrary:-<br />

One of the problems here is that staff and officers have an<br />

expectation that if there is an issue, it will be dealt with against<br />

transparent theories and criteria and there will be consistency of<br />

decision making. And the Borgia court would have been more<br />

transparent. (Interviewee G)<br />

This is corroborated by the Equality and Diversity report:-<br />

The pattern of management seemed to vary widely with, for<br />

example, some managers having regular team meetings and<br />

supervision systems with discussion and consultation taking<br />

place, and other teams meeting very occasionally and with very<br />

restricted agendas. Methods of communication also seemed to<br />

vary greatly, with some managers attempting to "cascade down"<br />

what was happening in the organisation and at the NEC levels,<br />

but with others communicating very little in any consistent way.<br />

There were also strong views expressed by staff about the<br />

different styles of individual managers and the inconsistency<br />

with which different issues and problems were dealt with and<br />

resolved between different managers. Overall, and this was<br />

confirmed by discussions with some senior staff, the different<br />

departments in the organisation could be seen to be<br />

autonomous in the way that they functioned in that they tend to<br />

work "individually" with a particular departmental style. There<br />

appeared in general to be no particular corporate approach,<br />

style or even message that was developed across in the<br />

organisation in its day-to-day management. This does not mean<br />

that the CWU does not have strong messages and clear<br />

leadership from the top of the union. Rather, the issue is how the<br />

organisation communicates with staff in a consistent and regular<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!