04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Resource distribution systems<br />

Delving more deeply, however, some of the issues at the root of the<br />

problem are perceived:-<br />

I'd like more control over the budget. He gives us a budget but<br />

there's not much I can do with that in the sense that if I said to<br />

the executive members, well you are not to have three meetings<br />

a year, then that is extremely difficult because of the power<br />

relationship there. But there is not much visibility of the budget<br />

and the budgeting process. What is missing is perhaps more<br />

authority to enforce it. The weakness in it is the top up system. I<br />

think what undermines it is that if you have a budget and<br />

different interest groups get top ups, it undermines the whole<br />

bloody thing. Instead of holding to it and going to my executive<br />

and saying about the budget, they would say well they will get it<br />

anyway so why should we bother. So it is undermined a bit by<br />

that sort of topping up. And then the financial control of the<br />

union, the transparency of the financial control of the union is<br />

one area where there is need for a lot of change. D is trying to<br />

put more structure into the budgetary process but on the other<br />

hand he is fighting a political culture where access to money is<br />

patronage and it gets very difficult really. And then again you<br />

have got the inconsistencies and lack of transparency.<br />

(Interviewee G)<br />

At a micro level, activists are to be brought into the system of<br />

budgetary control:-<br />

The finances of this union -- and I don't know how the finances<br />

of other unions work but I am going to speak to other unions --<br />

are almost, there is a mystique about the money. Nobody<br />

knows what it gets spent on but they make decisions about what<br />

it gets spent on. Which has got to stop. We have set up a new<br />

committee called the Budget Scrutiny Committee which is<br />

separate from the Finance Committee which is literally going to<br />

go through the bills and say, "what was this £2000 payment for,<br />

for this consultancy? Show us what we got?" Some head of<br />

research or some education officer will send you a bill -- I have<br />

got this university to do this research for me, you owe them<br />

£1700. I never asked them for it, I want to know what you have<br />

got for your £1700. You will come to me. You will explain what it<br />

is you want, why you have got to go to that university, why you<br />

can't go on the Internet, why we can't use research. The<br />

processes are going to change now, which they have never<br />

done in the past. As a result of that, people just spend money.<br />

(Interviewee N)<br />

To achieve better financial control, new systems are planned:-<br />

We're going to devise a software system that enables need to<br />

interrogate membership records so I can predict so that when a<br />

cheque arrives from the Post Office or BT, we can say to them,<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!