04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Deploying resources<br />

wonderful discussion over 8 pints of bitter. I’ve never been able<br />

to get to the bottom of it myself. But I don’t think it’s a right wing<br />

agenda. I think it’s a radical agenda to give power to the<br />

members. That’s all I want to do, to give power to the members.<br />

People can say that’s a left or a right wing agenda. You can pay<br />

your money and take your choice, but it’s pretty radical stuff.<br />

You can trust them. They are well-organised, well-educated<br />

people. What’s wrong with us? (Interviewee K)<br />

It was not clear at the time of the research – and it is certainly not clear<br />

now when the new process has resulted in the amendment of some of<br />

the Principal Rules – how far these new values were shared:-<br />

We have a Rule Book that marginalises Conference. Which is<br />

deeply saddening because Conference should be something<br />

positive and have something to contribute and something that<br />

people go away from feeling refreshed and ready for the next<br />

period back in the branches. We’ve got so caught up in the<br />

politics here, between the Executive and the Honorary Officers,<br />

that actually Conference is a bit inessential. There are certain<br />

rules they can change, they can make certain decisions, they<br />

can call for certain things, but under the Rules they can’t actually<br />

make those things happen (Interviewee H)<br />

At the present time, it is inevitable that there is a huge war going<br />

on between the Executive Committee, which got elected on the<br />

back of aims and values, Principal Rules, a member-centred<br />

union and the lay delegates who are still saying ‘Conference is<br />

the primary decision-making body, the Parliament of the<br />

organisation’ which I don’t believe is the case. It never was the<br />

case. And so inevitably you are going to get ‘yah, boo, sucks.’<br />

(Interviewee K)<br />

PCS is a fascinating union in these areas. The systems of moral rules<br />

influencing managers in the management of their relationship with the<br />

democratic structures are so unusual, so controversial with many<br />

activists – even with the new General Secretary who now celebrates<br />

the regaining of activist control by the replacement of biennial<br />

conferences with annual ones – that it is not surprising if managers<br />

express a variety of views. They do, however, think seriously about the<br />

issues and about their roles, even if their ideals of what constitutes<br />

‘widespread membership involvement in the representative process’,<br />

and how that should be operationalised, differ. As will be seen later,<br />

this will affect how they go about the task of managing the boundaries<br />

between the various stakeholder groups.<br />

Managerial Activities<br />

Deploying Resources<br />

6.12. In the discussion above about PCS’s financial systems, there was no<br />

mention of monitoring performance. The systems seemed rather<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!