04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing by information<br />

.<br />

.<br />

• The merger and the assimilation of staff into the new union<br />

has exceeded expectations. This has in large part been due<br />

to the democratic and open approach adopted from the start.<br />

Even before the merger staff from the three partners were<br />

brought together to share experience and to discuss the<br />

vision and mission of the new union.<br />

• The identification and cementing of a sense of common<br />

purpose has been greatly helped by further staff gatherings<br />

and the adoption of project management as a clearly defined<br />

mode of operation within UNiFI. This has maximised staff<br />

involvement in tackling and finding solutions to the major<br />

operational problems.<br />

• The Union's mission, to give members an improved service<br />

and a better deal, provides a clarity of purpose for all its staff.<br />

(UNiFI IIP Assessment, July 2000)<br />

Managerial Tasks<br />

Managing by Information<br />

7.12. The assessment cited above gives the impression that high levels of<br />

communication pertained within UNiFI. Indeed, the annual Daventry<br />

gatherings of staff, which will be referred to below in the context of<br />

project management, were very positive contributions to<br />

communications. The researcher attended a staff meeting in<br />

Bournemouth in March 2001 at which the Joint General Secretary used<br />

the occasion to communicate with staff on strategic matters such as the<br />

outcomes from Daventry, falling membership and merger strategy. He<br />

also said, at a fringe meeting at the TUC in 2000:-<br />

It has been said that, "most leaders die with their mouths open!”<br />

If we look at ourselves I think we can all see an element of truth<br />

in this. We, as leaders, must be able to communicate the<br />

direction of our organisation's development, and the reasons<br />

why change is necessary and why change is occurring the way it<br />

is, effectively both inside and outside the organisation. This<br />

communication also necessitates leaders listening to both<br />

employees and members. Preferably this should be 'dynamic<br />

listening': Asking questions all the time and not attempting to<br />

provide all of the answers. (Brief for UNiFI fringe meeting, TUC,<br />

Glasgow September 2000)<br />

The union’s Business Plan, incorporating mission, strategic objectives<br />

and key targets are circulated to all staff annually. And, of course, the<br />

personal development planning system is intended to involve<br />

communications on an individual level.<br />

Some managerial practice is consistent with this approach:_<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!