04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘Legitimate’ managerial actions - stakeholders<br />

The other tension is, of course, with the NEC, how they see their<br />

role. So on appointments, what used to happen until fairly<br />

recently, when we were appointing senior clerks they often had,<br />

say, the President on the selection panel, right. Now that<br />

doesn't happen any more because we are an employer. The<br />

people we are employing actually work here. The NEC<br />

members, whilst they run the union, they are not responsible for<br />

hiring and firing. That is clearly in the authority of the General<br />

Secretary and the SDGS and the personnel people. There is a<br />

bit of tension about that and they get a bit fed up sometimes<br />

when they see, like, if we're advertising a post. I think what<br />

some of them would like is they decide what post gets<br />

advertised and what post doesn't. My line on that, and we've<br />

had advice anyway, concerning the legal bit of it, is that it is<br />

clearly within the remit of the, like, the Chief Executive.<br />

The Strategic Plan which has been referred to several times in this<br />

chapter, is careful about boundaries. The Plan is ‘available’ to NEC<br />

members but the responsibility for drawing it up lies with the General<br />

Secretary and the Senior Management Team. The NEC is to be kept<br />

‘fully informed’ and any policy issues arising from the Plan will be<br />

submitted to the NEC for approval. Boundaries between governance<br />

and management are thus clearly defined, even if they might at some<br />

time be the subject of contest.<br />

And the Rule Book is generally not felt to be crucial in defining<br />

boundaries:-<br />

Sometimes the Rule Book helped you and sometimes it didn't.<br />

Rule Books are there sometimes for guidance; they certainly<br />

establish where the power lies and conference became adept at<br />

changing them on occasions.(Interviewee O)<br />

Although it may be that there are reasons for this which have their<br />

origins in power relations:-<br />

To some extent senior managers are the custodian of the Rule<br />

Book. If they had wanted to stand on the Rule Book and say<br />

"look at this; it may not be popular with you but this is what the<br />

rulebook says", I think we might have held the line on that. But<br />

senior managers themselves have found it convenient to play to<br />

their old constituencies, their old power bases.(Interviewee L)<br />

The same interviewee suggested that other issues were in any event<br />

more important for managers than the rules:-<br />

There has been a fantastic amount of time spent in trying to<br />

change the rulebook to bring the new union more together -- to<br />

get more issues at the centre, to limit the veto of the various<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!