04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cognitive rules and culture<br />

and then use that to get rid of people. That has been the pattern<br />

in the past. People have got away with blue murder. But there<br />

have been instances where people have gone too far and they<br />

have gone. (Interviewee H)<br />

One manager thinks these views may be over-stated:-<br />

I think the one most people in Unison talk about and would talk<br />

about if they were discussing with managers outside the<br />

organisation, if that's not getting too hypothetical, would be<br />

about what are perceived as constraints on personnel<br />

management, I think. If you get a group of managers in Unison<br />

together, they will say things like -- well, you can't tell anyone to<br />

do anything and you can't use disciplinary procedures, you can't<br />

do this and you can't do that. I have to say, I really think that's<br />

overstated. It's obviously a perception and it may have been the<br />

case more in the past. I think it's not true now. You know, I<br />

think it is pretty clear. I think the concern has always been that<br />

you wouldn't get senior management support if you initiate some<br />

kind of difficult disciplinary procedure, for example. I don't think<br />

that's the case. I think in Unison disciplinary procedures<br />

probably are used as a last resort but that's not necessarily a<br />

bad position to be in (Interviewee G)<br />

Lack of support from senior management is stated by another as a<br />

perception held by some, though, as here, she did not share it. Another<br />

manager, however, believes that such perceptions may be an excuse:-<br />

Meaning that if we had a problem with staff, for example, I think<br />

sometimes managers will find excuses not to deal with a<br />

member of staff or to deal with them perhaps in a very friendly<br />

way. I think that we should be sharper in dealing with them. I<br />

am not saying in a ruthless way, you are out, you are sacked. I<br />

think that is the wrong policy elsewhere when that happens. I<br />

think there are steps that we should take, such as counselling<br />

staff if there is a problem, discussing with them what is causing<br />

difficulty they may be experiencing from a work point of view.<br />

What I do think is that we don't do it quickly enough all sharp<br />

enough. We let things drag on at times here (Interviewee N)<br />

Speed in dealing with personnel issues is also raised as a criticism in<br />

another context:-<br />

Some of our personnel policies frankly are ludicrous. Some of<br />

the opportunities that people have -- I'll give you a classic<br />

example in here. We are going through it just now on a bullying<br />

and harassment case. The impact that has on the entire office<br />

for something that can spin on for two years and then is bound<br />

to be verging on the vexatious when no one is willing to do<br />

something about that -- when I say no one I mean, I think,<br />

295

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!