04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Moral rules and trade union principles<br />

interfere with it in ways that are not always helpful. If you are<br />

managing a company you are managing a command structure;<br />

we have this democratic structure. At the end of the day if they<br />

don't like what you're doing they can actually act as the last<br />

Court of Appeal. It is a constraint and we have a very big<br />

executive -- it's like a mini conference -- and I don't think it's<br />

helpful. (Interviewee O)<br />

Managing democratic structures was elevated to the status of a rule in<br />

one case:-<br />

There are such political sensitivities that they are subject to what<br />

I called the 51 week rule -- you do them 51 weeks before the<br />

next annual conference. Consciously, I had held back on doing<br />

unpopular things in relation to the staff until immediately after<br />

conference to forestall any stirring that goes on. That is the<br />

constraint. (Interviewee D)<br />

Issues of boundary management and representative rationality are<br />

significant and will be discussed below. At this stage it is sufficient to<br />

note that, whatever positive attitudes CWU managers may have to the<br />

fact of working in a democratic structure, aspects of that structure are<br />

felt by some managers to be a constraint which has to be managed.<br />

Systems relating to moral rules<br />

5.9. We look here at whether managers in the CWU expressed any<br />

espousal of principles having a bearing on how they managed in the<br />

union, in particular on how they manage people. There are some<br />

interesting contrasts in the way in which managers conceptualise their<br />

values in this area. One manager equated trade union principles with a<br />

concern for individual problems, a subset of ‘fairness’, one could<br />

argue:-<br />

If you go back to core trade union principles in allocating<br />

resources you must have regard to the scale of the problem that<br />

the member is facing and if you move too far away from that as<br />

an allocation for resources you potentially get corrupt, if you<br />

know it I mean. Because you are driven only by political<br />

considerations (Interviewee G)<br />

Others mentioned fairness specifically, but in the context of the need to<br />

be firm at the same time:-<br />

The trick is to be seen to be firm but fair. You can't have one<br />

without the other. (Interviewee O)<br />

It was just listening to people - firm but fair and we got<br />

there.(Interviewee M)<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!