04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER FIVE<br />

CASE STUDY – MANAGERS IN THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS<br />

UNION<br />

About the union<br />

5.1. The CWU was formed in January 1995 by a merger between the<br />

National Communications Union and the Union of Communications<br />

Workers. Paradoxically, the logic for the merger was stronger in the<br />

years before it took place than it was in 1995 because prior to the<br />

privatisation of British Telecom, members of both unions worked for the<br />

Post Office, either in telecoms or in postal services. In those days, so<br />

the General Secretary says, it was not unusual to find post office<br />

engineers who started life as postmen, having put in for a test to<br />

achieve this.<br />

5.2. The impetus for the merger dates from around 1985 and had ebbed<br />

and flowed in the years since then. There are three basic<br />

constituencies within the union. The first is communications engineers,<br />

working for BT and some other communications firms. The second is<br />

clerical workers who worked for Post Office Communications, as it was<br />

then, were members of the Civil and Public Services Association but<br />

who were transferred to the NCU in 1985. The third is the postal<br />

workers who made up the UCW. The union does organise in other<br />

organisations, for example the Alliance and Leicester, who took over<br />

Girobank and it does have a strategy of seeking to organise members<br />

in, for example, the expanding telecoms sector.<br />

5.3. The generally received wisdom is that it was the election of Tony<br />

Young as General Secretary of the NCU and Alan Johnson as General<br />

Secretary of the UCW that were the really key factors is the<br />

achievement of the merger. Both were very much in favour of it and<br />

enjoyed good personal, political and working relationships; both were<br />

able to provide the leadership that convinced the activists and,<br />

subsequently, the membership that merger was the way forward for the<br />

two unions. However, fuelled by demarcation disputes, there had been<br />

a good deal of branch pressure for merger over the years, in which the<br />

current General Secretary had been particularly active.<br />

5.4. CWU has declared membership of 279,679 in the current year of which<br />

around 20% are female. It deals with two major employers and<br />

therefore it is not surprising that its paid staff of 187 are concentrated<br />

almost exclusively at national level. Whilst it has a small number of<br />

regional offices, these are largely branch facilities, occupied by people<br />

who are on full time facility release from employers. On the postal side<br />

there are Divisional Officials paid in this way, serving to emphasise the<br />

fact that the regional structure is largely an ex UCW set up, dominated<br />

(contrary to initial plans) by ex UCW activists. The union’s national<br />

structure, accommodated in a single head office in Wimbledon,<br />

acquired in 1997 and intended to be equidistant between Ealing and<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!