04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Merger management<br />

The starting premise was that there were going to be no<br />

redundancies, not even voluntary ones. That came about<br />

because we had downsizing at Ealing two years before and we<br />

ended up with too many volunteers because it was a good<br />

package. The reality is that a lot of people actually wanted<br />

redundancy- they didn't want to come to the new headquarters<br />

but to manage that would have been very difficult. So the<br />

starting point was that we didn't want any redundancies,<br />

voluntary or otherwise. So everyone was going to have a job<br />

(Interviewee J).<br />

there was no corporate approach at all to the management of the<br />

merger, which seems very much to have been left to the managers<br />

concerned. At the outset, this even stretched to reaching agreement on<br />

who would do what:-<br />

Myself and my counterpart were very much left to our own<br />

devices to decide what we were going to do. Now that was<br />

probably a wise decision because we happen to be both very<br />

professional and we could come quite easily, because of our<br />

personalities, to a happy mutual agreement, because also of<br />

what our first loves were. So personally from that point of view<br />

that worked out well. Whether it was the right approach to have<br />

in this sort of situation, from a strategic point of view, with two<br />

senior people, I'm not sure but it turned out OK. In other words<br />

from a management point of view in dealing with myself and T<br />

there wasn't any input from senior level other than agreeing<br />

what we decided ourselves (Interviewee K)<br />

We worked it out between us. We eventually reached agreement<br />

that I would take on the role of Personnel and she would do<br />

Facilities. She wanted to keep some element of Personnel so we<br />

agreed that she would also do training. But no-one really asked<br />

us what was happening. If you asked D what his views were, he<br />

just wouldn't give them. So it really was a case that you had to<br />

sort it out yourself. I'm not sure what would have happened if we<br />

hadn't sorted it out ourselves. I suppose there was the pressure<br />

of knowing that if we couldn't sort it out ourselves, someone else<br />

was going to do it and we might not like the outcome.<br />

(Interviewee J)<br />

This individualistic approach continued with the building of new<br />

functions within the merged headquarters building:-<br />

So I had to make sure that the two different cultures were<br />

merged together so that the benefits of membership will be well<br />

achieved by all. In doing so, first of all what I had to do was to<br />

visit the office in Ealing because I came from the Postal side,<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!