04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resource distribution systems<br />

It is my role to provide timely and meaningful financial<br />

information to the NEC and the Finance and General Purposes<br />

Committee so that they can make informed decisions. I also<br />

have to keep all my colleagues who hold budgets, about 35 or<br />

40 of them who are budget holders, we need to supply<br />

information to them about how their budgets are running so that<br />

they can warn them if they are going to over spend. Beyond that<br />

I supply all sorts of information to people as and when they want<br />

it.<br />

So UNISON’s systems seem devolved and formal and there is little<br />

direct criticism of them. In terms of physical space, at national level, the<br />

first decision after merger had been to set up a project team to seek a<br />

new headquarters. This resulted in a recommendation to the NEC,<br />

which was approved against serious opposition, to negotiate in respect<br />

of three buildings, one in London Docklands, one in the City of London<br />

and one in Islington, the latter – only about a mile from the former<br />

NALGO head office, being the favoured option. However, the first<br />

UNISON conference in 1994 instructed that negotiations cease. The<br />

researcher has his own cultural analysis of that decision, gained as<br />

participant observer, but that does not form part of this research.<br />

However, this decision was regretted:-<br />

On the other hand, we didn't have that much choice. Well, of<br />

course, we did. We could have had a new head office, Mike, as<br />

you well know. We could have all been in one place from day<br />

one but there you are. (Interviewee J)<br />

During the merger process people who I know who worked for<br />

private companies, like Price Waterhouse, who had gone<br />

through a merger said whatever you do avoid having a split<br />

head office. They said always have one. It makes life so much<br />

easier. And I think that's true. (Interviewee E)<br />

As was the way it was reached:-<br />

I think they (ex NALGO activists) were clearly trying to achieve<br />

the preservation of Mabledon Place, not necessarily all for the<br />

same reasons. It was immensely symbolic. The lay members<br />

took a number of decisions over a period of time that we were<br />

going to have a new union, we were going to have new<br />

structures, new this, new that but we were not going to have a<br />

new head office. We were effectively going to take a decision<br />

which meant one of the head offices of the partner unions was<br />

going to be the head office. I think there were a lot of people<br />

motivated by that. I think, to be honest, AJ was motivated by<br />

that. I think he worked actively to retain Mabledon Place.<br />

(Interviewee A)<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!