04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER EIGHT<br />

MANAGERS IN UNISON<br />

About the Union<br />

8.1. UNISON was formed in 1993 by the merger of three public service<br />

unions, COHSE (the Confederation of Health Service Employees),<br />

NALGO (the National and Local Government Officers’ Association) and<br />

NUPE the National Union of Public Employees). As mentioned earlier,<br />

it was, and still is, the largest merger in UK trade union history and the<br />

merger was a process of extreme complexity.<br />

8.2. The three unions were very different. NALGO was primarily a white<br />

collar union – formed, in fact, originally in 1905 to campaign for<br />

pensions for very senior local government officials. It retained in<br />

membership a proportion of senior officials and in 1980 had led a<br />

dispute seeking comparability pay for local government staff which led<br />

to a settlement giving 18% at the top and 9.5% at the bottom. Its<br />

membership had peaked at around 750,000 in the 1970s and its losses<br />

in membership had not been catastrophic, probably because<br />

privatisation had not hit administrative, professional and technical staff<br />

as hard as it had blue collar staff. NUPE was primarily a blue collar<br />

union and, although retaining a membership on merger of over<br />

500,000, it had suffered both loss in membership and income which<br />

caused a financial crisis in 1991. The two unions were fiercely<br />

competitive, not only because of the few overlaps which occurred<br />

(since NUPE had in membership a number of white collar staff, often<br />

because they wanted to be in a union which was affiliated to the Labour<br />

Party) but also because of their approaches to trade unionism. NALGO<br />

activists tended to see NUPE, which had a powerful and visible officer<br />

corps, as less democratic than NALGO, something which caused major<br />

problems when local branches amalgamated some time after merger<br />

and ex NALGO activists largely took control of the structure. Both<br />

unions organised in local government, the National Health Service<br />

(NHS) and the utilities. NALGO organised in addition in transport and<br />

was virtually the sole union in Electricity.<br />

8.3. COHSE by contrast was largely a one industry union, with its origins<br />

amongst mental health nurses in the NHS. It had originally turned down<br />

the opportunity of joining merger discussions but eventually did so in<br />

1990, at which point merger discussions re-commenced. It had<br />

obviously competed with both of the other unions in the NHS but it was<br />

much smaller than the other two unions, even though it was an equal<br />

partner in the negotiations.<br />

8.4. One particular issue worthy of note is that NALGO had many more staff<br />

than either of the other unions. At the time of merger, it had in the<br />

region of 1300 staff, whereas NUPE had only around 400 and COHSE<br />

nearer 100. NALGO had several large central departments and very<br />

powerful district offices, as it called them, with significant lay structures<br />

built around them. This was obviously to have a significant impact on<br />

274

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!