04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Union organisation is often very complex and those in their top<br />

echelons have to consider the management of the democratic process,<br />

representing the interests of many of the most significant stakeholders<br />

in their unions. The theory of polyarchy recognises that unions consist<br />

of a variety of interest groups and individuals with legitimate interests in<br />

those unions. Yet, the suggestion that senior officials should in any<br />

respect manage any part of the democratic process would be regarded<br />

as an affront by many academics writing in the trade union field. One<br />

such academic walked out of the room when the researcher made such<br />

an implication at an academic conference. Stakeholder management,<br />

however, does not imply that managers are assuming powers or<br />

responsibilities which belong more properly to the members or their<br />

elected representatives. It suggests that thought is being given to how<br />

(inter alia) the democratic process might work better or staff in the<br />

union working with the members might empower the membership.<br />

Modes of management in such circumstances might arise from a<br />

manager’s deeply held belief in trade unionism, in fairness, justice,<br />

equality and unity. In literature from the management, as distinct from<br />

the trade union, field this might be described as normative stakeholder<br />

management.<br />

This study is researching managerial activities in trade unions.<br />

Originally, the study was much more closely concerned with the<br />

management of mergers, so it was natural that, in considering which<br />

unions to study, there should be concentration on unions which had<br />

merged. As the study changed, this focus was kept for a different<br />

reason. The extent of managerial activities in unions other than the<br />

researcher’s own were simply not known. As mentioned earlier, what<br />

was assumed was that, in bringing unions together in merger,<br />

somebody had to manage something. Four merged unions were<br />

therefore chosen.<br />

CWU<br />

The Communications Workers Union was formed in 1995 from the<br />

merger of the Union of Communications Workers (UCW) and the<br />

National Communications Union (NCU). Both unions had their origins<br />

in the Post Office, when that organisation ran Post Office<br />

Telecommunications (now BT) and the Post Office. The UCW was<br />

predominantly a blue collar union and the NCU was mixed blue and<br />

white collar – it had itself merged in 1985 with a section of CPSA white<br />

collar workers working in the Post Office. Those members had retained<br />

a good deal of autonomy within NCU, which became an issue when the<br />

CWU was formed because they wanted to retain as much of that<br />

autonomy as possible.<br />

There was a long history of rivalry between UCW and NCU over many<br />

years. Merger only came on the agenda when Alan Johnson became<br />

General Secretary of UCW and Tony Young became General<br />

Secretary of NCU. They were close personally and politically and were<br />

very influential in bringing the merger about. There were, however,<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!