04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Legitimate’ managerial actions - stakeholders<br />

Where lay members get feedback that something has gone<br />

wrong which involves the interface with members…..then they<br />

do want to become involved. For example, there was lay<br />

member interest in whether to set up a PCS Direct service and<br />

also in the range of membership services which are presently<br />

being tendered. Lay members skim across the range of<br />

management issues and take an interest in things that impact on<br />

members. Where things are going well, there is no significant<br />

pressure. (Interviewee F)<br />

It is clear from these observations that such frustrations or concerns<br />

raise all sorts of issues about managing the boundaries between the<br />

lay structure and trade union managers. These boundaries can take a<br />

number of forms. The first is the practical issue of managing the<br />

relationships:-<br />

I think that in CPSA there was probably too much involvement in<br />

the day-to-day running of the office by senior lay officials which I<br />

never see as part of their function. The General Secretary<br />

allowed that interference, which I think is wrong. Now in PCS<br />

there isn't that direct involvement -- it is not obvious to me. Yes<br />

they are involved in appointments and things like that which is<br />

different and I have no problem with that but whether somebody<br />

should be moved, for example, from one office to another or<br />

change their duties, I do not think that that direct involvement is<br />

appropriate in a bargaining area. You may want to consult when<br />

you are changing officials but I am talking about something more<br />

serious, about changing people's type of work or where they<br />

move to and getting involved in that sort of thing……….I'm<br />

happy to work along with elected members and I have been an<br />

elected representative myself before I became a full-time official<br />

but I think we have our own roles in the bargaining area or in the<br />

union, wherever we are. My role is making recommendations to<br />

committees, theirs is taking a decision and telling me what is<br />

acceptable and what isn't. We have clear roles and the running<br />

of the team is certainly my job and not that of elected people..<br />

(Interviewee O)<br />

The second involves issues about political and power relations<br />

between managers and lay activists:<br />

Coming to this organisation - well, going to PTC first of all - this<br />

was very much lay run. The officers thought the same, that was<br />

their paradigm, that they were primarily a political grouping, the<br />

NUCPS officers, but that was breaking down because the lay<br />

officers were against that and were wanting to exert themselves.<br />

And then they merged with CPSA, which was a full time officer<br />

run union or a full time plus the senior lay officials with the other<br />

lay officials being voting fodder frankly. I suppose that was a<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!