04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the way their unions operate in the members’ interests. The argument<br />

is that the data demonstrates that this is what they are seeking to do.<br />

Yin (1994:32 et seq) sets out a number of tests for judging the quality<br />

of research designs. These, together with an indication of the extent to<br />

which this study meets these tests, are set out in Exhibit 3.4:-<br />

Tests Case Study Tactic Treatment<br />

Construct validity • Multiple sources of<br />

evidence<br />

• Chain of evidence<br />

Internal validity • Pattern matching<br />

• Explanation<br />

building<br />

External validity • Replication logic in<br />

multiple case<br />

studies<br />

Reliability • Use case study<br />

protocol<br />

• Develop case<br />

study database<br />

73<br />

Interview and<br />

documentary<br />

evidence<br />

QSR NVivo trees of<br />

nodes established<br />

from propositions<br />

Both these tactics<br />

have been employed<br />

as part of the analysis<br />

of this data<br />

This tactic is the basis<br />

of the claims for<br />

generalisability made<br />

in the conclusions.<br />

The protocol is<br />

intended primarily for<br />

cases where there are<br />

multiple researchers,<br />

though one was used.<br />

The whole research<br />

material, however, is<br />

held on an NVivo<br />

database.<br />

EXHIBIT 3.4 Case study tactics. Adapted from Yin (1994:33)<br />

Healy and Perry (1998) propose a set of quality criteria specifically<br />

related to case study research within the realist paradigm. They<br />

develop six criteria for judging realist research. These are shown in<br />

Exhibit 3.5:-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!