04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PROP 2.<br />

Importance of<br />

physical space<br />

and structure<br />

PROP 4.<br />

Stakeholders<br />

PROP 5.<br />

Boundaries –<br />

political and<br />

power relations<br />

PROP 2.<br />

Importance of<br />

physical space<br />

and structure<br />

(such as open plan, shared space, team space,<br />

landscaped space, cellular space) or design? If<br />

so what view did you have on the benefits of the<br />

particular solutions chosen?<br />

• Did other stakeholders have different views - if<br />

so, what were they?<br />

• To what extent were stakeholders involved in<br />

the process of determining operational issues<br />

such as layout and design?<br />

• What attention (differential or otherwise) was<br />

paid to their views and why and how? What has<br />

been the result of the implementation of the<br />

decisions?<br />

• How do the various other stakeholders see the<br />

results of implementation?<br />

HEAD OFFICE ROLE<br />

• Number and proportion of staff at head office<br />

• Strategy for size and role of head office<br />

• Relationship with other levels in managerial terms<br />

(i.e. targeting, guiding, directing, running)<br />

• Reasons for that approach -implicit/explicit?<br />

(cultural issues here)<br />

• Did the strategy impact on physical space<br />

decisions?<br />

428

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!