04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing action - leadership<br />

To try to get them to open up and talk and to be positive about<br />

the merger and working in the team. So it was giving them the<br />

time. Certainly I worked on the basis that they would suggest<br />

how they wanted to work and that in a way was how it<br />

happened. So, for example, when they came together after a<br />

year, when they came together to work they had been used to<br />

working in certain offices. And it was asking them "how do you<br />

want to work." (Interviewee O)<br />

In the end, the key was to make team meetings important<br />

because of getting information that they would not get otherwise.<br />

One other thing I did was to say that I will tell you what I know<br />

and I will be open and honest with you and if it is confidential, I<br />

will still tell you but you have to respect that confidentiality. And<br />

the first time you don't I will stop telling you. And we decided that<br />

we might as well have a gossip at the team meetings, which is<br />

often much more fun anyway. So you will hear the gossip and<br />

hear the information. And the attendance has got better.<br />

(Interviewee B)<br />

Team meetings were seen in this case as an important part of<br />

managerial communication, something which, it was suggested earlier,<br />

had not been effective throughout the union.<br />

The language of teams was used positively and easily by managers in<br />

PCS, both in formal and informal ways. At senior level, the lack of an<br />

adequate strategic team, no doubt for reasons rehearsed earlier, was<br />

something to be regretted, even if there was criticism of some team<br />

meetings for poor management and lack of relevance:-<br />

There is again the pretence of teams and structures. We get<br />

together with H. There are eight of us. And the meetings are<br />

appalling. There is no benefit. We get nothing out of it. I do not<br />

come away with a list of things to do. There has been no<br />

discussion about projects. It is the political nature of the<br />

managers and with how H operates. He actually operates on a<br />

one-to-one basis but does the team meeting thing. All the real<br />

work is in a one-to-one with H where he sets out his ideas and<br />

your views and we discuss them and that works find. But then<br />

there are these team meetings that go on all day - the Head<br />

Office management team. (Interviewee F)<br />

Managing action<br />

6.16. In PCS, as in many parts of many organisations and particularly in<br />

trade unions, there are debates about the difference between<br />

leadership and management (in Mintzberg’s (1994) terms between<br />

‘controlling’ and ‘doing’. At the highest level, this can be seen as<br />

ensuring that the union reflects some of his objectives:-<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!