04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusions<br />

plan space. This is not wholly shared but the emphasis is different from<br />

that in some other unions.<br />

Systems related to cognitive rules<br />

UNiFI managers perceive their union to operate as a partnership<br />

between managers and lay members. They come to this, however,<br />

from different traditions; from staff associations which exhibited high<br />

General Secretary influence (maybe decreasing over the years) to a<br />

trade union which was well known for the interventionist nature of its<br />

lay members. That lay members still exert an unusual degree of<br />

influence may be illustrated by the fact that senior lay members are<br />

members of the Senior Management Group.<br />

However, as in many areas in UNiFI the symbol of lay member<br />

influence, or lack of it, is the principle of company committee autonomy.<br />

This automatically limits the power of the NEC and sets out a very clear<br />

boundary in its influence. Some managers, particularly in the light of<br />

their partner union experience, are still unhappy that lay members have<br />

too much potential for control; others, from BIFU, believe there has<br />

been a substantial change in the direction of managerial authority.<br />

But there are ways in which management itself has problematic<br />

features, based on people’s experiences on trade unions and the<br />

expectations of trade union officers who ‘do not like being interfered<br />

with.’ It may not be valued; or else trade unionists may be<br />

‘embarrassed’ to manage, taking into account that in partner union<br />

days the concept may not have been given any credence in some<br />

unions. Some managers have found these factors a problem more than<br />

others and some believe that the issue is not necessarily the<br />

acceptance of resistance to management but the nature of<br />

management that is offered. However, there is a view that<br />

management of performance or conduct is particularly difficult in UNiFI,<br />

several comments on which suggest that this is a cultural feature of the<br />

union rather than the effect of any deficiency in the systems<br />

themselves.<br />

Systems related to moral rules<br />

With one exception, UNiFI managers who expressed a view about their<br />

core trade union principles related them to relationships with people.<br />

They talk of fairness, doing as you would be done by, nurturing,<br />

openness, consistency. One manager, as so many do, talked about<br />

trade union principles as though they assumed that the interviewer<br />

knew what they were but without specifying them further.<br />

These principles also seem to extend to relationships with the lay<br />

structure. There are significant examples of managers who find the lay<br />

structure constraining. Some managers also point out problems,<br />

potential and real, with the structure. However, in most cases, even<br />

where this is done, they seem to believe that things are improving or<br />

basically satisfactory. Some are very positive about their relationships,<br />

268

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!