04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Merger management<br />

happen and we discussed them with Ed and Rory and agreed it<br />

and we then had to implement that. That was a huge task. The<br />

first priority, we decided, was that we had to get the right people<br />

with the right skills in the right places. We did not promise<br />

anything outside the department until we knew that we could do<br />

that. So there was the question of some staff going on<br />

redundancy, others seeing what their expectations were, trying<br />

to work out the best of each of the schemes of research that<br />

there had been before and add in some more (Interviewee J)<br />

There was a delay while some people left but we were allowed<br />

to replace those people in different functions and get the skills of<br />

the new people up and running. It was a great period of change<br />

and uncertainty so there was kind of reassurance. We built a<br />

team of new people in when we needed them are obviously we<br />

were a year behind in doing that. (Interviewee J)<br />

Well first of all it was building a team. This was partly about<br />

bringing on individuals but it was also about relationships within<br />

the team and initially, because we were doing a lot of training,<br />

John and I initiated and directed a lot of things, kind of top down<br />

within the department. What we have tried to do, very<br />

consciously, is to try and set that down and change the balance<br />

of it with that (Interviewee J)<br />

Meanwhile, some in senior management had their own pressing<br />

concern:-<br />

The discussions went on for hours on what our new titles would<br />

be. I was not very popular at the meetings because I had<br />

listened to so much and said "look, there are not far short of<br />

200,000 members out there waiting for some sort of service out<br />

of us. We have now spent upwards of 2 hours talking about<br />

what our new titles could be. I couldn't care less. You can call<br />

me office junior if you want to. Just give me a meaningful<br />

position in the new organisation and you can call me anything<br />

you like. But can we please get on." And I was isolated. But<br />

no, this was very important, that we got the titles right and it was<br />

an issue that the others in the room clearly attached far greater<br />

importance to than I did. But it was as a result of all that and<br />

possibly as a result of my little spat that we have ended up with<br />

all these titles that we had in the old organisations. (Interviewee<br />

M)<br />

Despite the insufficiency of data on how a corporate approach to<br />

management of the merger was managed on the ground, the IIP<br />

assessment of July 2000 made a number of findings, based on staff<br />

feedback, which indicate that some success was achieved:-<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!