04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Teams<br />

The other thing that we've introduced recently is a project<br />

management culture into the union. And I think that that is<br />

enormously beneficial because (a) it gives a focus for a task and<br />

(b) very, very importantly it says that that's task will not just be<br />

the responsibility of management -- it will be the responsibility of<br />

whoever is on the project team. And I think that that builds and<br />

bonds in a far greater way if people get the idea that they have<br />

ownership; a belief that they are important and that they have a<br />

role to play and that they are treated equally within the project. I<br />

think that's a very useful way to take things forward and I think<br />

that these things have all come about in recent years against a<br />

background of the IIP culture and what we were looking for.<br />

(Interviewee O)<br />

This seems to have been an idea that originated during the merger<br />

campaign:-<br />

One of the things that we started talking about during the merger<br />

was a different way of internal working, a project based way of<br />

working, so we started to work in teams. And that did break the<br />

church and state in terms of the region, the organisers’ role and<br />

clerical staff role. So that was the kind of third leg of the<br />

roadshows. And we put together for the first time teams at work<br />

cross regional, or between institutions and regions, to become<br />

the merger teams. And they were allowed more freedom to print<br />

their own T-shirts, create their own dynamic around their own<br />

patches and we also at that time did the first analysis of where<br />

our members were in any meaningful terms………… Our<br />

objective when we went into the merger was to try and get<br />

people working together and working in teams, all this cross<br />

boundary stuff. The pips that I have and the stripes that an<br />

organiser had, not that. Just trying to make them work together<br />

and share information. Impossible in a trade union, I know, but<br />

we do try. So that was what we set out to do. And there was an<br />

overwhelmingly successful campaign for the merger. I think with<br />

hindsight some of the things that we tried to put in place in terms<br />

of the project way of working, some of the structures that we<br />

thought might come out the other side in terms of strategic<br />

thinking were probably a bit too ambitious in some ways<br />

because in hindsight they were never going to last effectively<br />

through the merger. (Interviewee G)<br />

The union organised staff conferences in Daventry in 2000 and 2001<br />

and it was here that strategic project teams were formed and to which<br />

they reported back:-<br />

We've gone through a series of projects from a big conference<br />

we've had in Daventry. From that we then formed up all our staff<br />

into project groups and gave them things to do. Some of them<br />

have come to a conclusion and this is basically a summary.<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!