04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘Legitimate’ managerial actions - stakeholders<br />

then the next executive meeting says, well that was a silly<br />

decision and we insist that there is not only paper but it is blue<br />

and it is very expensive, that decision, even though it is not<br />

theirs to take, they could take (Interviewee D)<br />

Similarly with Conference:-<br />

If D stands up in front of conference and says this decision for a<br />

new tier in the organisation is going to cost £2 million, we have<br />

not got it and it will bankrupt the union - in a business, that view<br />

would never get challenged. In our organisation conference can<br />

say that we want to spend that £2 million and your job then is to<br />

try and recover it from somewhere else. (Interviewee D)<br />

The consequence of which is that:-<br />

I used to love going to conference but I'm afraid I hate it now<br />

(Interviewee D).<br />

Perhaps this is a symptom of institutional conflict:-<br />

I think the generality is respect for the General Secretary’s<br />

position. There is a lot of natural support but you have a<br />

constant battle within officer groups and within the executive<br />

council (Interviewee D)<br />

And it is certainly the case, as we saw in the story about substitution for<br />

officers discussed above, that boundaries are contested:-<br />

Sometimes there is a desire of the executive to actually try and<br />

run the administration of the organisation or to interfere with it in<br />

ways that are not always helpful. If you are managing a<br />

company you are managing a command structure; we have this<br />

democratic structure. At the end of the day if they don't like what<br />

you're doing they can actually act as the last Court of Appeal. It<br />

is a constraint and we have a very big executive -- it's like a mini<br />

conference -- and I don't think it's helpful. (Interviewee O)<br />

Boundaries relating to staff, in fact, are the ones which are most<br />

frequently mentioned:-<br />

Ideally the executive would have no bloody role at all on people<br />

issues and the administration of the union. They may have a<br />

corporate governance issue with relation to finance but to<br />

anybody who has a contract of employment with the union then<br />

it comes to how you manage those people. I would not involve<br />

the executive at all. It's a delegated function totally through the<br />

managers. That would be the first thing (Interviewee G)<br />

The new General Secretary, accepting that boundary management is<br />

important, has wasted no time in seeking to define the boundaries:-<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!