04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER SIX<br />

CASE STUDY – MANAGERS IN THE PUBLIC AND COMMERCIAL<br />

SERVICES UNION<br />

About the Union<br />

6.1. PCS, the Public and Commercial Services Union, was formed in 1998<br />

from a merger of PTC, (the Public Services, Tax and Commerce Union)<br />

and CPSA (the Civil and Public Services Association). PTC was itself a<br />

merger between IRSF (the Inland Revenue Staff Association) and<br />

NUCPS (the National Union of Civil and Public Servants). PTC had<br />

only had about 2 years of existence before the second merger took<br />

place. PCS instantly became the largest civil service union with over a<br />

quarter of a million members.<br />

6.2. It was a controversial merger. There had been several previous<br />

attempts to merge and a previous attempt at amalgamation of civil<br />

service unions had been unsuccessful. CPSA NEC voted against<br />

continuing with the merger. This illustrated the principal area of<br />

controversy which concerned the power of activists. CPSA had a<br />

tradition of left wing activists dominating its lay structures, particularly<br />

its Annual Conference. Those fashioning the merger were given a<br />

legislative opportunity (because on merger rules can be changed<br />

without activist approval if they are supported in a ballot by the<br />

membership) to address this. They saw it as a major issue and<br />

conducted a campaign for the adoption in the new union of a set of<br />

aims and values. These included a set of ‘principal’ rules which could<br />

only be changed by ballot of the membership and which provided (inter<br />

alia) for a biennial conference (since changed), the biennial election of<br />

the National Executive and which also ensured that ‘on any issue which<br />

the National Executive Council considers a matter of major policy’, a<br />

decision of Conference would not take effect unless endorsed in a<br />

membership ballot. They went ahead to a membership ballot on the<br />

merger despite the decision of CPSA Conference. The members voted<br />

to merge but the merger did not take effect until after the conclusion of<br />

an unsuccessful court challenge by dissentient activists.<br />

6.3. In the merger which created PTC, many members of the merging<br />

unions had remained in their old buildings. Some IRSF staff did move<br />

to NUCPS buildings with common services; there was some trauma<br />

both for those who moved and joined merged teams and those who<br />

stayed and felt abandoned. IRSF had a relatively modern building in<br />

Victoria. It was ring-fenced in resource terms for the Inland Revenue<br />

group because the old union had been worried about NUCPS’s<br />

finances and did not want its principal asset thrown into the PTC ‘pot’.<br />

NUCPS had a warren of old buildings in Southwark Street, near<br />

London Bridge. So although considerable thought was given to merger<br />

management activities (the unions worked closely together for 2 years<br />

before merger and IRSF brought their senior managers to <strong>Cranfield</strong>),<br />

the managers and staff did not physically move. Upon the creation of<br />

PCS, it was decided to move the whole union to the head office of<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!