04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Moral rules and trade union principles<br />

do not involve ourselves with private medicine. We have<br />

abandoned all that which the previous organisation used to do<br />

so we have that ethical stand. We will not deal with other<br />

organisations that we think have dodgy ethics. We have put an<br />

ethical process into our mission --the actual statement of what<br />

we are all about, what are basic aims are about.<br />

UNiFI managers are not, like so many other trade union managers,<br />

specific about their perceptions of what trade union principles actually<br />

are. There is, however, some evidence of approaches to management<br />

derived from attitudes towards issues such as fairness, openness,<br />

consistency, honesty and social responsibility, supported by ethical<br />

statements in the union’s Business Plans. We need now to see<br />

whether it is possible to discern moral rules in their attitudes towards<br />

representative rationality, given that a strategic objective of the union is<br />

to:-<br />

widen membership activity and participation in the Union's<br />

decision making process (UNiFI Business Plan 2001)<br />

There has been some discussion earlier about lay members as a<br />

constraint on managerial behaviour. The point was made that this was<br />

not a generalised view. This does seem to be the case. UNiFI<br />

managers point out perceptions of potential problems with the lay<br />

structure:-<br />

There is a danger I would see in having an organisation that is<br />

more lay member led. With the officials, one hopes you have<br />

the right officials in place because there has been a rigorous<br />

selection process. The lay people, with the election process that<br />

we have, I fear sometimes the members vote for them on the<br />

strength of a pen portrait -- they may not know them too well. I<br />

think the dangers of getting the wrong lay people in key<br />

positions is greater. Not that I have got any specific problems. I<br />

just see the dangers. (Interviewee M)<br />

And some unpleasant experiences:-<br />

Early on I went to the national executive committee meeting.<br />

They were making unreasonable demands. For example, they<br />

wanted a high profile media campaign on this subject and they<br />

wanted it to be just switched on, and maybe switched off, but<br />

more importantly there was an element of if something didn't go<br />

right then it was the Communications department's problem. I<br />

went there and said "well hold on a minute, you may think that<br />

but what about this, and this and this?" I'm into the stage now<br />

where I think that it is more of a waste of time going because<br />

they have got out of the habit. It was quite tough early on<br />

because all the comments you got were negative. You may<br />

have produced one million pieces of paper but one was wrong<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!