04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

considerable cultural differences between the two organisations.<br />

COHSE was a much smaller union which had been seeking to develop<br />

a team ethos in the way it worked. It was particularly concerned not to<br />

be submerged by the two bigger unions and therefore, as a single<br />

industry union, sought a leading role in a strong Health service group.<br />

The General Secretary of NUPE, Rodney Bickerstaffe, was by far the<br />

best known of the three, the others being Alan Jinkinson (NALGO) and<br />

Hector MacKenzie (COHSE). Negotiations, however, were long and<br />

involved and lay members from all three unions were involved to a<br />

greater or lesser extent. It was always expected that NALGO members<br />

would be the most resistant to merger (as it proved in the ballot) and so<br />

it could be argued that Alan Jinkinson had a principal role in getting out<br />

the vote and handling some very difficult conferences; furthermore,<br />

merger would not have been on the agenda of his predecessor.<br />

However, unlike the other mergers, arguably the personality and<br />

attitudes of the General Secretaries were not as much of a significant<br />

factor in leading the process. Rules were agreed under which Alan<br />

Jinkinson retired in 1996 and was replaced by Rodney Bickerstaffe.<br />

Hector MacKenzie was Associate General Secretary until his<br />

retirement in 2000.<br />

UNISON is principally a public sector union but does have private<br />

sector members as a result of privatisation and outsourcing.<br />

In terms of merger management, UNISON made significant use of<br />

trainers and training establishments (mainly <strong>Cranfield</strong>) in guiding the<br />

process. Its managers accepted early on that the creation of a new<br />

union was a 10 year enterprise – and so it has proved. Only after over<br />

6 years were staff brought together at national level in a single Head<br />

Office – that of former NALGO. The very substantial cultural differences<br />

between the unions were addressed by the commissioning of an<br />

anthropological study (Ouroussof 1993A and 1993B) which surfaced<br />

the values and assumptions of organisational members and suggested<br />

ways in which the new union could address them. This was probably a<br />

unique step amongst unions and is very rare elsewhere.<br />

Because of my previous employment at a senior level in UNISON until<br />

January 2000, I did not commence researching in that Union until<br />

August 2002.<br />

1.4. METHOD AND CONTRIBUTION<br />

A case study approach has been adopted. This has been for a<br />

number of reasons. First, Yin (1994) suggests that case studies can<br />

facilitate the answer to ‘how’ questions and the research question<br />

falls into that category. Yin defines the case study as ‘an empirical<br />

inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real<br />

life context’ (page 13). Miles and Huberman (1994) define it as ‘a<br />

phenomenon of some sort occurring within a bounded context’ (page<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!