04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elected members of both unions went ahead to membership ballot on<br />

the proposals. There was an unsuccessful legal challenge before<br />

merger could take effect.<br />

There were significant cultural differences between PTC and CPSA.<br />

The latter, despite its strong activist led culture, did accord significant<br />

power to the General Secretary. PTC had a decision structure which<br />

was much more open and committee based. The CPSA General<br />

Secretary used his power, in ways which were not (allegedly) always<br />

transparent. When, therefore, the decision was taken to move PTC<br />

staff into the old CPSA Head Office soon after merger, there was scope<br />

for significant cultural collisions.<br />

The strategy on merger had been that the two Joint General<br />

Secretaries would run the organisation for two years but that, on the<br />

retirement of John Sheldon, the ex PTC General Secretary, Barry<br />

Reamsbottom, the ex CPSA General Secretary would take over.<br />

However, rule changes were effected in 2000 which led (after a series<br />

of convoluted events not directly relevant here) to an election for<br />

General Secretary taking place in that year and the election of Mark<br />

Serwotka, who took office in May 2002. The union had to face legal<br />

proceedings prior to Mark Serwotka’s taking of office being confirmed.<br />

Barry Reamsbottom was one of only two officials in any union who<br />

refused to see me.<br />

UNiFI<br />

UNiFI was formed in 1999 by the merger of the Banking, Insurance and<br />

Finance Union (BIFU), the National Westminster Bank Staff<br />

Association (NWSA) and UNiFI, formerly the Barclays Bank Staff<br />

Union. BIFU had been by far the largest of the three unions and<br />

regarded itself as the union for all finance staff. However, it had not<br />

been appealing to potential members, partly, it was suggested,<br />

because of BIFU’s political nature and its ‘one size fits all’ approach to<br />

unions who might otherwise have merged with it. Unions preferred to<br />

merge with ASTMS (later MSF) to be able to have a degree of freedom<br />

to pursue their company affairs without too much central interference.<br />

The massive changes in the finance sector had led many unions to<br />

consider their positions. <strong>Cranfield</strong> undertook a report on these trends in<br />

1997 which led to UNiFI, for whom the report was written, deciding to<br />

merge with MSF. However, this was overturned by the Executive and<br />

the three way merger was proposed as the alternative. The tripartite<br />

nature of it was regarded as important to prevent the domination of<br />

BIFU. Further, central to the scheme of merger were rules which gave<br />

autonomy on collective bargaining matters to Company Committees,<br />

preventing interference in those processes by any centrally operating<br />

National Executive Council.<br />

The General Secretary of NWSA, Rory Murphy, had been appointed<br />

from outside the union and very early on indicated that merger would<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!