04.05.2013 Views

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

MICHAEL DEMPSEY - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resource distribution systems<br />

And now what I would like everyone to do is to sit down with<br />

everybody and say, this is what we do. (Interviewee B)<br />

In terms of physical resources, CWU had committed itself under the<br />

Instrument of Amalgamation to find a new head office somewhere in<br />

between Ealing (where NCU resided) and Clapham (where UCW<br />

resided), although the outcome, Wimbledon, was closer to Clapham.<br />

There were some serious political issues which surfaced in achieving a<br />

decision on this:-<br />

What happened is basically that Stalinism took over. Because<br />

what happened is there was an attempt by people at Ealing to<br />

block going to Wimbledon. Basically, there was an NEC called<br />

and the vast majority of the ex UCW made sure they turned up<br />

to vote it in. And it was as brutal and as crude as that, to vote in<br />

coming to this building because they thought it was the ideal<br />

thing. So it was quite a brutal process, to be honest (Interviewee<br />

B)<br />

The move took place two years after merger and did not resolve the<br />

cultural aspects of merger because the two industrial groups encamped<br />

on different floors, with artefacts of their previous existence installed as<br />

a ‘comfort blanket’. The system for allocating space was centrally<br />

driven, though there was consultation on individual aspects of it. Within<br />

that, the approach seems to have been relatively laissez-faire:-<br />

I was consulted on general facilities for the floor and how we<br />

should arrange our floor because very often how you arrange<br />

and layout reflects the culture you have got anyway, doesn't it?<br />

It it is quite interesting. All our officers said no we must have<br />

small offices so that our secretaries can have offices on the<br />

open floor whereas on the postal side all the officers said we<br />

wanted big offices and all the secretaries ended in the middle. It<br />

shows that we have a slightly more collegiate style here. And<br />

you noticed that virtually all the PAs have got their own office or<br />

are in a shared office. Now that was the officers’ choice, not the<br />

PAs’ choice. (Interviewee G)<br />

In the view of at least one manager, this approach was only partly<br />

successful:-<br />

A lot of staff in the postal and telecoms areas were given their<br />

space and told to organise it and they were working with the<br />

same colleagues. They just had to move their office. The<br />

departments which involved the bringing together of staff<br />

included the Research Department where we thought that we<br />

had already got a common style of working. At the other extreme<br />

was the Legal Department which not only were moving two<br />

groups together but moved them at different times, which I think<br />

was a cultural disaster. (Interviewee L)<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!