Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Oliver Moravcik, Dagmar Caganova and Jana Stefankova
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Excellent Very Good Good Sufficient Satisfactory
Figure 12: Satisfaction rate with <strong>the</strong> faculty choice
Moreover, more pleasant evidence for <strong>the</strong> faculty’s management is <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> students are
highly satisfied with <strong>the</strong>ir choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faculty. However, a problem in <strong>the</strong> future may be <strong>the</strong>
permanent sustainability <strong>of</strong> this trend. Excellent results <strong>of</strong> this technically focused faculty are not just a
matter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faculty’s own point <strong>of</strong> view.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Excellent Very Good Good Sufficient Satisfactory
Figure 13: Satisfaction rate with informedness at <strong>the</strong> faculty
For completeness it is necessary to mention that questionnaires also <strong>of</strong>fer an opportunity <strong>of</strong> verbal
attitude to individual questions, if appropriate, to present one’s own commentary or critique. The
faculty management and/or <strong>the</strong> dean deal with <strong>the</strong> verbal opinions <strong>of</strong> questionnaires and publish a
competent standpoint on <strong>the</strong> faculty web page.
The following selected questionnaire survey results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> students’ satisfaction is processed in <strong>the</strong>
figures:
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Excellent Very Good Good Sufficient Satisfactory
Figure 14: Satisfaction rate with <strong>the</strong> number and quality <strong>of</strong> individually solved projects
682
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010