28.04.2014 Views

W. C a r e w H a z l i t t Coinage of the European Continent

W. C a r e w H a z l i t t Coinage of the European Continent

W. C a r e w H a z l i t t Coinage of the European Continent

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Descriptive Outline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coinage</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Europe 421<br />

balanced jurisdiction, induced <strong>the</strong>m to favour and support<br />

<strong>the</strong> pretensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy See, and while this policy<br />

tended to maintain <strong>the</strong>ir rule over outlying portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

dominions, it also laid <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> a system which reduced<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir power to an almost nominal point. During centuries,<br />

Italy, like Germany and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, remained an open<br />

ground for successive adventurers, who supplanted each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r or who, quarrelling among <strong>the</strong>mselves, opened <strong>the</strong><br />

country to some new force, ever ready to seize an opportunity<br />

for aggrandisement.<br />

The Franks, who never possessed in <strong>the</strong> Peninsula more<br />

than a feudal suzerainty, apart from <strong>the</strong>ir protectorate over<br />

Rome, have left, however, traces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir presence and sway<br />

incomparably more distinct and diffused than those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Goths and Lombards. These conquerors did not fail to<br />

discern <strong>the</strong> value, as a mark <strong>of</strong> fealty and a vehicle for<br />

publicity, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> principle by which <strong>the</strong> seigniorial and<br />

municipal coinages carried on <strong>the</strong> face <strong>the</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> issue<br />

under <strong>the</strong>ir sanction ;<br />

and from <strong>the</strong> prominence which we<br />

find accorded to <strong>the</strong> imperial name even by princes and<br />

cities virtually independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crown nay, at first by<br />

<strong>the</strong> pontiffs <strong>the</strong>mselves we must infer that such a feature<br />

in <strong>the</strong> monetary economy was viewed as a source <strong>of</strong> protection<br />

and an improvement <strong>of</strong> title. But, independently <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> money issued in alliance with cities and princes, <strong>the</strong><br />

Franks at <strong>the</strong> first outset adopted <strong>the</strong> common expedient <strong>of</strong><br />

copying <strong>the</strong> type and module <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> currency already in<br />

vogue, and <strong>the</strong> moneyers <strong>of</strong> Clothair himself, when Italy<br />

fell to his portion after <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Clovis, were led, if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y<br />

were not instructed, to follow a style superior to any found<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir own currency, and recommended by<br />

its<br />

popular<br />

acceptance.<br />

The successors <strong>of</strong> Charlemagne were unable to uphold<br />

in its integrity <strong>the</strong> vast empire which he left to <strong>the</strong>m. The<br />

Carlovingian line became extinct on <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Louis IV.<br />

(908), having enjoyed <strong>the</strong> sovereignty during even a shorter<br />

period than <strong>the</strong>ir precursors, but leaving behind <strong>the</strong>m far<br />

more solid monuments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir existence and domination.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!