28.04.2014 Views

W. C a r e w H a z l i t t Coinage of the European Continent

W. C a r e w H a z l i t t Coinage of the European Continent

W. C a r e w H a z l i t t Coinage of the European Continent

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Descriptive Outline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coinage</strong>s <strong>of</strong>Europe 485<br />

in <strong>the</strong> same manner as Germany, Italy, and Great Britain,<br />

to found a monetary system. The too omnivorous amateur<br />

is<br />

apt to regret his universality when he discovers that it<br />

involves accommodation for coins in silver and copper at<br />

least, emanating from Paris, and dedicated to <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> St.<br />

Domingo, French Guiana, Cambodia (Kan-pou-chi], Patagonia,<br />

Madagascar, East Africa, Cochin China, and Tunis. These<br />

currencies principally follow <strong>the</strong> French standard ;<br />

but that<br />

<strong>of</strong> Patagonia is in centavos and that <strong>of</strong> St. Domingo in<br />

escalins.<br />

Feudal <strong>Coinage</strong> <strong>of</strong> France<br />

The feudal or seigniorial money <strong>of</strong> France, which owed<br />

its rise and development to <strong>the</strong> same agencies as that <strong>of</strong><br />

Germany, <strong>the</strong> Low Countries, and Italy, cannot be compared<br />

with <strong>the</strong> latter in any respect save its vast extent and its<br />

multifarious character or personality. Its origin has been<br />

usually traced to <strong>the</strong> decentralising influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enfeebled<br />

imperial authority after <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Charlemagne ;<br />

but in fact <strong>the</strong> system and spirit had long acquired a definite<br />

growth when <strong>the</strong> Frankish rule was extended over France<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Marches <strong>of</strong> Spain, and merely waited for an opportunity<br />

to consolidate itself. The government <strong>of</strong> Charlemagne,<br />

alike in this and o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> his wide dominions, was<br />

strictly on a feudal basis, and was parallel with <strong>the</strong> subordinate<br />

control <strong>of</strong> numerous minor sovereigns <strong>of</strong> graduated rank and<br />

jurisdiction. The difference between a strong and a weak<br />

hand really concerned <strong>the</strong> great feudatories ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong><br />

smaller ;<br />

and <strong>the</strong> decline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monarchy,<br />

while it favoured<br />

<strong>the</strong> aggrandisement <strong>of</strong> such states as Burgundy, Brittany,<br />

Aquitaine, and ultimately Normandy, and indirectly opened<br />

<strong>the</strong> way for <strong>the</strong> English occupation <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kingdom<br />

during more than a century, produced equally striking<br />

fruits in <strong>the</strong> settlement on a permanent footing, as a distinct<br />

political factor and a dominant social phenomenon, <strong>of</strong> a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!