Covenanter Witness Vol. 54 - Rparchives.org
Covenanter Witness Vol. 54 - Rparchives.org
Covenanter Witness Vol. 54 - Rparchives.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ment,"<br />
age."<br />
quiet"<br />
oath."<br />
present."<br />
pleased."<br />
But they do deserve our respect, our commemora<br />
tion, and our imitation. That's the whole reason<br />
for thinking of the "History of Covenanting" now.<br />
They say to us, "Be ye followers of us as we also<br />
are of Christ."<br />
And once again, the covenants had helped win<br />
the battle with<br />
Satan, because no human sword<br />
could "cut" what God had bound together within<br />
that severed sacrifice.<br />
When Satan saw that he could not defeat such<br />
men as these by the sword, he turned to subtile<br />
temptation. First came the indulgences. The king<br />
promised relief for all who would take a modified<br />
oath or just "keep on certain issues. The<br />
ranks were split by indulgences.<br />
Second, the king offered a "Revolution Settle<br />
and the covenants were largely ignored be<br />
cause everyone was tired of fighting and afraid<br />
to mention the subject. The King then granted the<br />
church permission to exist.<br />
The "remnants" which refused to approve of<br />
this settlement were without a pastor for 16 years.<br />
Then the Rev. John McMillan joined the remnant<br />
in 1706 because he believed in the covenants. Our<br />
church was formed in 1743 and McMillan later wrote<br />
of the name, "REFORMED PRESBYTERY," it is<br />
"a title properly expressive of their principles and<br />
ground of constitution, namely, a presbytery, the<br />
first since the revolution, properly erected upon the<br />
footing of an approbation of, and an adherence to<br />
the whole of our covenanting reformation . . .a<br />
presbytery constituted in an immediate dependence<br />
upon the Lord Jesus Christ Our "Reformed<br />
Presbytery"<br />
Church was founded upon the principles<br />
of the Covenanted Reformation, in opposition to all<br />
the trials of these times of temptation. The Cove<br />
nants brought us our first pastor.<br />
THE TIMES OF RENEWAL<br />
For obvious reasons, the times of renewal must<br />
be remembered today. History<br />
points with pride<br />
and advice to her many valuable covenant renewals.<br />
Most of these came after the Revolution set<br />
tlement but one, the National Covenant was renew<br />
ed in 1596. Christianity had not been flourishing,<br />
churches were empty, people had heart trouble,<br />
ministers were lazy. The renewal of the covenant<br />
was requested, and approved, and an eyewitness has<br />
described the scene:<br />
"On this solemn occasion, Davidson preached<br />
so much to the conviction of his hearers, and in their<br />
name offered up a confession of their sins to heaven<br />
with such fervent emotions that the whole assem<br />
bled ministers melted into tears; and rising from<br />
their seats at his desire, and lifting up their right<br />
hands, they renewed their covenants with God. . .<br />
The scene continued three hours, was deeply af<br />
fected beyond anything that the oldest person pre<br />
sent had ever witnessed. The sacred action extended<br />
to congregations and the ordinance was obeyed<br />
with an alacrity and fervor which spread from<br />
parish to parish till all Scotland like Judah of old,<br />
"rejoiced at the Andrew Melville said after<br />
this experience, "(Renewal) is a highly spiritual<br />
symbol, and calculated to prove highly stimulating<br />
to a luke warm witness-bearer or a drooping church<br />
in any<br />
In 1745, the Secession Church renewed the<br />
March 16, 1955<br />
covenants beginning with a confession of sin which<br />
was made up on the spot, with personal and heartsearching<br />
contributions from every man. Again it<br />
was followed by a committment to duty and pass<br />
ed down to presbyteries and congregations. And<br />
again the whole of Scotland felt the impact of the<br />
revival. From that year onward, the Secession<br />
Church required all her seminary students to be<br />
personal covenanters from the first year of their<br />
study.<br />
Prof. Duncan, Scotland's outstanding Hebrew<br />
Scholar, said, "It secured a higher level in the per<br />
formance of ministerial duty than would have been<br />
possible without it." Professor Watt said: "It was<br />
their solemn dedication and the preparation for it,<br />
that seems to have been a land mark in many useful<br />
lives. Without a shadow of doubt this was one of<br />
piety."<br />
the main instruments in promoting Secession<br />
Even in the corrupt State Church of 1766, a<br />
few tried it and of this effort, a present day histor<br />
ian said: "It may therefore be concluded that it did<br />
serve its primary purpose of keeping alive the<br />
evangelical cause within the Church of Scotland."<br />
A professor at the University of Edinburgh<br />
spoke recently of meeting people in Scotland yet<br />
today who "assign a conspicuous place in their own<br />
spiritual development to ... a renewal of the cove<br />
nants. It involved a soul-stirring and life-renovating<br />
upturn in their actual<br />
But it is in the record of the covenant renewal<br />
in our own church, that we find a sharp warning.<br />
All the covenants were renewed by the faith<br />
ful remnant in 1689 just before the Revolution<br />
Settlement. They were renewed again in 1712 near<br />
Auchensaugh, and again in 1745 by the newly form<br />
ed "RE-FORMED PRESBYTERY," our church in<br />
Scotland. Professor Watt has termed this renewal,<br />
"something that can legitimately be called a 're<br />
newal of the Covenants'," to distinguish it from<br />
other bonds of adherence to a covenant.<br />
The Auchensaugh renewal was included in the<br />
terms of membership and communion but around<br />
1800 a few people began to complain. In 1818, ses<br />
sions were left free to read or to omit the clause<br />
concerning renewal, "as they<br />
In 1822<br />
(only 4 years later) the clause was deleted.<br />
From 1822 onward, frequent letters and dele<br />
gations from Ireland and America urged a joint<br />
covenant. The movement failed in Scotland while<br />
succeeding in other countries. Our Church in Scot<br />
land never again renewed the covenants.<br />
In 1872, under heavy pressure from a union<br />
committee, all reference to covenanting was remov<br />
ed from licensure and ordination formulas and in<br />
1873 another church magazine said with some irony:<br />
"It is not altogether unnoticeable here that the Re<br />
formed Presbyterian Synod's Committee on union,<br />
though representatives of those who so long claim<br />
ed to be <strong>Covenanter</strong>s par excellence, has entirely<br />
ignored the Covenants and the doctrine of Cove<br />
nant Obligation, in the statement of principles given<br />
into the Joint Committee" on church union.<br />
It was only about twenty years from the time<br />
they refused to exercise the privilege of covenant<br />
approved its removal as a<br />
renewal till the majority<br />
term of communion.<br />
The Union of a majority of the members of our<br />
Scottish church took place three years later and<br />
167